RE: DFDs Are Great! Was Re: DFD BFD

Subject: RE: DFDs Are Great! Was Re: DFD BFD
From: Tony Markos <ajmarkos -at- yahoo -dot- com>
To: "TECHWR-L" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com>
Date: Thu, 9 Dec 2004 17:23:07 -0800 (PST)


See "King Kong vs Godzilla".

Tony "Godzilla" Markos

--- Michael Strickland <Mstrickland -at- entriq -dot- com> wrote:


Fascinating! When does this compelling script come
to the big screen?

--- Chuck Martin <cm -at- writeforyou -dot- com> wrote:

Reaching back a bit.....

Tony Markos wrote:
<snip>
As I have posted several times: The major thing that
a TW is to do is come
up with a detailed, comprehensive understanding of
the essential end-user
tasks, and how all those tasks interrelate - with
special emphasis placed on
understanding the interrelationships.

Chuck Martin next comments:

Understanding end-user tasks is a straw man. What
technical writers (and
interaction designers) require is an understanding
of users' goals.

Tony Markos:

The only thing I know about straw men is the guy in
the Wizard Of Oz movie.
Someone else on this listserv accused me of creating
a straw man; what the
heck is a straw man?

Actually, I used to use "goal" instead of "task"
with my above statement,
but I changed it because because I thought it made
the statement more> understandable to many. (Goal is
more of an abstract
term; many people on
this listserv have real problems with abstraction.)

FYI:

Task, goal, function, process, or activity - they
can all refer the same
thing. For example "Plan for Retirement" can be,
depending upon your
preference, a task, goal, process, function, or
activity. This is simply a
matter of "different strokes for different folks" -
thats all.

Tony Markos:

From the Gospel according to Ed Yourdon [insert clap
of thunder here]: "ONLY
by following the flow of data [in task analysis] can
we come up with an
understanding [and therefore be able to explain to
others] the underlying logic of a system".

Chuck Martin:

Why do users have to understand the logic of a
system.

Tony Markos:

It very well might be that the users don't need to
understand the underlying
logic of the system. But, the TW has to have a
comprehensive understanding
of the underlying logic of the system in order to
properly orgainze his/her
thoughts, in order to give the user whatever he/she
needs in a user-friendly
fashion.

Chuck Martin:

Users are people, and people are not logical. So
then the question is: why
hasn't the system been designed to accommodate the
user, rather than forcing
the user to accommodate to the system.

Tony Markos:

And On and On and On .........




__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail - now with 250MB free storage. Learn more.
http://info.mail.yahoo.com/mail_250

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

ROBOHELP X5 - SEE THE ALL NEW ROBOHELP X5 IN ACTION!

RoboHelp X5 is a giant leap forward in Help authoring technology, featuring all new Word 2003 support, Content Management, Multi-Author support, PDF and XML support and much more! View an online demo: http://www.macromedia.com/go/techwrldemo

---
You are currently subscribed to techwr-l as:
archiver -at- techwr-l -dot- com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-techwr-l-obscured -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
Send administrative questions to lisa -at- techwr-l -dot- com -dot- Visit
http://www.techwr-l.com/techwhirl/ for more resources and info.



References:
RE: DFDs Are Great! Was Re: DFD BFD: From: Michael Strickland

Previous by Author: Re: Kovitz's "Practical Software Requirements" Was Re: expanding our range
Next by Author: Re: Life Cycle PLanning
Previous by Thread: RE: DFDs Are Great! Was Re: DFD BFD
Next by Thread: RE: Self publishing [online]


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:


Sponsored Ads