TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
regarding my acceleration ned wrote: Uh, Ye-ah!? It is called adrenaline...
i respond: well, no, actually. i mean of course there is adrenaline, but to imply that that is the cause of the progressive acceleration during my writing process is to put the cart before the horse. what i described here really feels key:
"but then...i can see it. i see how it's all going to come together, i see beyond my nose and all the way down the street. the text to come is so obvious, it simply falls out of what i?ve already written."
of course adrenaline becomes a part of this, particularly as i become increasingly menaced by a deadline, but the image i have is that i plod forward little by little until i reach a point where what i've written suddenly begins to tell me exactly where to go next, and further all the way through to the end. it's like suddenly the entire text appears in my brain and all i have to do is "dictate" it to my fingertips. i hurry because of the deadline, because of the adrenaline, because it is thrilling (evanescent thoughts of "i'm a genius!"), and because of the possibility that this text in my brain might disappear before i can get it all down.
ned wrote : PRAISE??
now hold on. i don't mean to imply that managers have bowed down before me, that my home or cubicle is adorned with trophies of the naked TW striking an inspired and representative pose. "praise" in the average tech writer's life seems to me to be something very muted, when even it does occur. and in my experience, that praise, when it comes, is usually in reference to what the document has solved or accomplished rather than any recognition of the document?s inherent clarity, beauty, or lack of errors. i don't normally hear, "that?s a great document," but i might hear, "that document made training easier and pretty much eliminated calls to tech support." more often than not, however, it seems that it's up to me to point those things out. during a review, for instance.
my academic writing, on the other hand, has fairly regularly drawn praise, sometimes to an embarrassing degree.
-diotima
_______________________________________________
No banners. No pop-ups. No kidding.
Make My Way your home on the Web - http://www.myway.com
ROBOHELP X5 - SEE THE ALL NEW ROBOHELP X5 IN ACTION!
RoboHelp X5 is a giant leap forward in Help authoring technology, featuring all new Word 2003 support, Content Management, Multi-Author support, PDF and XML support and much more! View an online demo: http://www.macromedia.com/go/techwrldemo
---
You are currently subscribed to techwr-l as:
archiver -at- techwr-l -dot- com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-techwr-l-obscured -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
Send administrative questions to lisa -at- techwr-l -dot- com -dot- Visit http://www.techwr-l.com/techwhirl/ for more resources and info.