RE: Why not Word97?

Subject: RE: Why not Word97?
From: "Downing, David" <DavidDowning -at- Users -dot- com>
To: "TECHWR-L" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com>
Date: Wed, 12 Jan 2005 13:01:26 -0500


If I disable this feature, will Word stop creating those lousy "char"
styles. Like "Normal paragraph char char char char char char char"?

-----Original Message-----
From: Gene Kim-Eng [mailto:techwr -at- genek -dot- com]
Sent: Wednesday, January 05, 2005 4:06 PM
Subject: Re: Why not Word97?


One thing I would add to Jonathon's suggestions is, as soon as you first
start up Word, look for an autocorrect option called "automatically
create styles from your formatting" and disable it before you open a
single doc file. This annoying "feature," which I first encountered
when we upgraded from Word 2000 to Word 2003, will read the formatting
of any text that
doesn't exactly fit a predefined style and create a new style from it.
If you
open a file created by one of your style-challenged predecessors who
manually formatted Normal text on the fly, you could end up with an
unlimited number of "styles" with names like "12pt," "12pt indented,"
"10pt indented bulleted," etc., etc., ad nauseum. I don't know WHAT
they were smoking when they came up with this one.

Gene Kim-Eng



----- Original Message -----
From: "Jonathan West" <jwest -at- mvps -dot- org>
To: "TECHWR-L" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com>
Sent: Wednesday, January 05, 2005 12:42 PM
Subject: RE: Why not Word97?


>
> Word 97 is still in fairly widespread use. I come across it in about
> 10% of my customer comapnies.
>
> The fundamental file format is the same from Word 97 through Word
> 2003, but with additions to accommodate extra features as you more
> through the versions.
_____________________________________________________________________________________
Attention:
The information contained in this message and or attachments is intended
only for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain
confidential and/or privileged material. Any review, retransmission,
dissemination or other use of, or taking of any action in reliance upon,
this information by persons or entities other than the intended recipient
is prohibited. If you received this in error, please contact the sender and
delete the material from any system and destroy any copies.
_____________________________________________________________________________________
This email message has been scanned for Viruses and Content and cleared
by NetIQ MailMarshal
_____________________________________________________________________________________

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

WEBWORKS FINALDRAFT - EDIT AND REVIEW, REDEFINED
Accelerate the document lifecycle with full online discussions and unique feedback-management capabilities. Unlimited, efficient reviews for Word
and FrameMaker authors. Live, online demo:
http://www.webworks.com/techwr-l

Technical Communication Certificate online - Malaspina-University College, Canada. Online training in technical writing, software (FrameMaker, RoboHelp, Dreamweaver, Acrobat), document & web design, writing manuals, job search. www.pr.mala.bc.ca/tech_comm.htm for details.

---
You are currently subscribed to techwr-l as:
archiver -at- techwr-l -dot- com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-techwr-l-obscured -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
Send administrative questions to lisa -at- techwr-l -dot- com -dot- Visit
http://www.techwr-l.com/techwhirl/ for more resources and info.



Follow-Ups:

Previous by Author: RE: use cases - what are they good for
Next by Author: RE: Seeking counsel - yet another difficult work situation (very long!)
Previous by Thread: Re: Why not Word97?
Next by Thread: RE: Why not Word97?


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:


Sponsored Ads