Re: Are you innovative?

["Gene Kim-Eng" <techwr -at- genek -dot- com>]

The second paragraph contains the seeds of something useful, 
*if* you can rewrite it to reflect that you actually produced the 
deliverable, on-time and within budget, *and* that it resulted in 
the CBO approving the funding for the project after similar 
attempts by others had failed to do so.  However, the first
paragraph won't be of any help until you make a clear point in
the second.  Nobody cares what methodology you employ
until they get the point about what the results achieved.

Gene Kim-Eng

 

"Tony Markos" <ajmarkos -at- yahoo -dot- com> wrote...
> 
> How about this for innovation:  
> 
> As a TW, I creatively used Data Flow Diagrams to, in
> about seven business days, rigorously define the scope
> of a vary large-scale federal government software
> project.  
> 
> Prior analysis efforts, all $25 Million of it, had
> failed to adequately produce this deliverable, even
> though it was THE key to Congressional Budget Office
> approval of many hundreds-of-millions of future
> funding dollars for the project.  



^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

WEBWORKS FINALDRAFT - EDIT AND REVIEW, REDEFINED
Accelerate the document lifecycle with full online discussions and unique feedback-management capabilities. Unlimited, efficient reviews for Word
and FrameMaker authors. Live, online demo:
http://www.webworks.com/techwr-l

---
You are currently subscribed to techwr-l as:
archiver -at- techwr-l -dot- com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-techwr-l-obscured -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
Send administrative questions to lisa -at- techwr-l -dot- com -dot-  Visit
http://www.techwr-l.com/techwhirl/ for more resources and info.