Re: HTML v. PDF

Subject: Re: HTML v. PDF
From: Bill Swallow <techcommdood -at- gmail -dot- com>
To: "TECHWR-L" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com>
Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2005 10:42:33 -0500


> We're assuming that we'd still need to provide PDFs of these guides for
> people who want to download the entire guide to their desktop. As a
> result, our workload would increase to provide both outputs. Would any
> benefits that the clients get from HTML doc be worth the extra workload?

If you use WWP correctly your workload increase will be minimal.

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

WEBWORKS FINALDRAFT - EDIT AND REVIEW, REDEFINED
Accelerate the document lifecycle with full online discussions and unique feedback-management capabilities. Unlimited, efficient reviews for Word
and FrameMaker authors. Live, online demo:
http://www.webworks.com/techwr-l

---
You are currently subscribed to techwr-l as:
archiver -at- techwr-l -dot- com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-techwr-l-obscured -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
Send administrative questions to lisa -at- techwr-l -dot- com -dot- Visit
http://www.techwr-l.com/techwhirl/ for more resources and info.



Previous by Author: Re: Taking Credit
Next by Author: Re: HTML v. PDF
Previous by Thread: Re: HTML v. PDF
Next by Thread: Re: HTML v. PDF


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:


Sponsored Ads