Re: HTML v. PDF

Subject: Re: HTML v. PDF
From: "John Fleming" <johntwrl -at- hotmail -dot- com>
To: "TECHWR-L" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com>
Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2005 16:27:01 +0000


From: leeghunter -at- gmail -dot- com (Lee Hunter)
Subject: Re: HTML v. PDF
Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2005 11:36:46 -0500

Here's another view from PlanetPDF which takes more of a middle ground

http://www.planetpdf.com/mainpage.asp?WebPageID=1493

While it is nice to have the middle ground, I do note the date on the article is June 10, 2001, and appears to deal with Acrobat 3.

Now I didn't start becoming a heavier Acrobat user until version 5, so I can't speak for version 3. However, given that Acrobat is now up to version 7, I'd prefer a middle ground that is a) more recent and b) refers to a more recent version (either version 6 or version 7).

--
John Fleming
Technical Writer
Edmonton, Canada



^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

WEBWORKS FINALDRAFT - EDIT AND REVIEW, REDEFINED
Accelerate the document lifecycle with full online discussions and unique feedback-management capabilities. Unlimited, efficient reviews for Word
and FrameMaker authors. Live, online demo:
http://www.webworks.com/techwr-l

---
You are currently subscribed to techwr-l as:
archiver -at- techwr-l -dot- com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-techwr-l-obscured -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
Send administrative questions to lisa -at- techwr-l -dot- com -dot- Visit
http://www.techwr-l.com/techwhirl/ for more resources and info.



Previous by Author: RE: New TECHWR-L Poll Question - VBA, Macros, etc.
Next by Author: RE: HTML or PDF?
Previous by Thread: Re: HTML v. PDF
Next by Thread: RE: HTML v. PDF


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:


Sponsored Ads