Re: HTML v. PDF
Here's another view from PlanetPDF which takes more of a middle ground
http://www.planetpdf.com/mainpage.asp?WebPageID=1493
While it is nice to have the middle ground, I do note the date on the article is June 10, 2001, and appears to deal with Acrobat 3.
Now I didn't start becoming a heavier Acrobat user until version 5, so I can't speak for version 3. However, given that Acrobat is now up to version 7, I'd prefer a middle ground that is a) more recent and b) refers to a more recent version (either version 6 or version 7).
--
John Fleming
Technical Writer
Edmonton, Canada
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
WEBWORKS FINALDRAFT - EDIT AND REVIEW, REDEFINED
Accelerate the document lifecycle with full online discussions and unique feedback-management capabilities. Unlimited, efficient reviews for Word
and FrameMaker authors. Live, online demo:
http://www.webworks.com/techwr-l
---
You are currently subscribed to techwr-l as:
archiver -at- techwr-l -dot- com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-techwr-l-obscured -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
Send administrative questions to lisa -at- techwr-l -dot- com -dot- Visit
http://www.techwr-l.com/techwhirl/ for more resources and info.
Previous by Author:
RE: New TECHWR-L Poll Question - VBA, Macros, etc.
Next by Author:
RE: HTML or PDF?
Previous by Thread:
Re: HTML v. PDF
Next by Thread:
RE: HTML v. PDF
Search our Technical Writing Archives & Magazine
Visit TechWhirl's Other Sites
Sponsored Ads