resume fondling -- am I being too picky?

["Tom Johnson" <tjohnson -at- freeway -dot- net>]

To me, these don't indicate shoddy work. I think it would be overkill 
to include these on a resume.

> 4) Failure to indicate which tools were used at which jobs.

> 5) Failure to indicate size of documentation projects at various 
jobs;
> was it a long doc or short one? (I can infer some of this from the
> tools used, PPT for example would cause me to believe the doc was
> short, but I cannot infer that a user guide is either short or long.)


This is nitpicky! I seldom ever need to worry about properties. I can 
see where it might matter to some people, but for the most part, who 
cares. Maybe someone is using a friend's computer and doesn't even 
know about document properties. It says nothing about their competence.

> 10) Document properties that list an author other than the candidate.

Tom Johnson
Elk Rapids Engineering x.5033
tjohnson -at- starcutter -dot- com 


If I had a legal disclaimer here--asking you to delete any messages I 
didn't mean to send to you--most people would ignore it. So, I won't 
say that.



^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

WEBWORKS FINALDRAFT - EDIT AND REVIEW, REDEFINED
Accelerate the document lifecycle with full online discussions and unique feedback-management capabilities. Unlimited, efficient reviews for Word
and FrameMaker authors. Live, online demo:
http://www.webworks.com/techwr-l

---
You are currently subscribed to techwr-l as:
archiver -at- techwr-l -dot- com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-techwr-l-obscured -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
Send administrative questions to lisa -at- techwr-l -dot- com -dot-  Visit
http://www.techwr-l.com/techwhirl/ for more resources and info.