Re: Bad Office Organization

Subject: Re: Bad Office Organization
From: quills -at- airmail -dot- net
To: "TECHWR-L" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com>
Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2005 20:42:25 -0500

It is a simple matter of applied organization. The die have been cast, and without someone backing down, a real ego downer, only failure will reverse this decision. Or so it seems from my past experience.

Have you tried explaining how task force organization is more efficient? How the functional group can provide better support for the projects by pooling its resources and assigning them as needed?

Unfortunately, there are plenty of studies books, etc, that propose both the above organization, and the foolishness you are experiencing. You might try that the U.S. Army uses task force organization but retains administrative and functional entities separately. Which is what I described above.

Scott Turner


Now Shipping -- WebWorks ePublisher Pro for Word! Easily create online
Help. And online anything else. Redesigned interface with a new
project-based workflow. Try it today!

Doc-To-Help 2005 now has RoboHelp Converter and HTML Source: Author content and configure Help in MS Word or any HTML editor. No proprietary editor! *August release.

You are currently subscribed to techwr-l as:
archiver -at- techwr-l -dot- com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-techwr-l-obscured -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
Send administrative questions to lisa -at- techwr-l -dot- com -dot- Visit for more resources and info.

Bad Office Organization: From: David Loveless

Previous by Author: Acrobt 7 - Pencil Tool
Next by Author: RE: New TECHWR-L Poll Question - Office Spaces
Previous by Thread: Re: Bad Office Organization
Next by Thread: RE: Bad Office Organization

What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads