TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Re: Using Wikipedia as an "authoritative" source...
Subject:Re: Using Wikipedia as an "authoritative" source... From:Mitchell Maltenfort <mmalten -at- gmail -dot- com> To:"TECHWR-L" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com> Date:Wed, 19 Oct 2005 14:05:09 -0400
On 10/19/05, Dick Margulis <margulisd -at- comcast -dot- net> wrote:
>
> Mitchell Maltenfort wrote:
> > But I find that Wikipedia is very nice for two things:
> >
> > * public-domain graphics.
> >
> > * an estimate of the "consenus" opinion on a topic.
>
> In many fields (scientific, medical, technical, economic, political,
> historical, and cultural fields, just to pick a few obvious categories),
> there are numerous internal debates going on all the time. If someone
> with an agenda with respect to those debates writes the article, chances
> are you are going to come away with a one-sided view of current thinking.
>
That's why I said "an estimate" and I put "consensus" in quotes. For
example, I looked up "cerebellum" recently on Wikipedia to find a
public-domain graphic and read in the entry that besides roles in
motor control, the cerebellum may have a role in attention.
It didn't give a reference, of course. But it did alert me that this
may be a point of debate among scientists working in the cerebellum.
--
I can answer any question.
"I don't know" is an answer.
"I don't know yet" is a better answer.
Try WebWorks ePublisher Pro for Word today! Smooth migration of legacy
RoboHelp content into your new Help systems. EContent Magazine Decision-
maker review (October 2005) is here: http://www.webworks.com/techwr-l
Doc-To-Help 2005 converts RoboHelp files with one click. Author with Word or any HTML editor. Visit our site to see a conversion demo movie and learn more. http://www.componentone.com/TECHWRL/DocToHelp2005
---
You are currently subscribed to techwr-l as:
archiver -at- techwr-l -dot- com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-techwr-l-obscured -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
Send administrative questions to lisa -at- techwr-l -dot- com -dot- Visit http://www.techwr-l.com/techwhirl/ for more resources and info.