TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
This is a case of submitting a figure to shut someone up and place a
checkmark in the "received" column. You realize that if it turns out
to be anywhere's near accurate, it will be pure dumb luck...I mean,
how does how quickly a developer massages a piece of code correlate
to how quickly you can document it?
> using 50% to capture the QA/testing. I am inclined to the same
> figure.
> What would you use. Thank you.
If they truly want an accurate number vs "a" number, I would use the
process that I use for any project plan.
I know it takes me a day to write, verify, and polish half a page of
content. With minor exception, I also chunk my content into an
average of a half page per topic. If it's a large topic, I chunk it
into multiple half-page topics. Therefore, when I produce an outline
with every topic I can anticipate, I can count up the number of
topics and multiply by a day each.
This method has proven to work for me. Maybe it wouldn't work for
you. However, instead of pulling a nice round number out of the air,
if you want the number to have credibility, it must be based on a
proven process, not a throw of the dice.
John Posada
Senior Technical Writer
"So long and thanks for all the fish."
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
WebWorks ePublisher Pro for Word features support for every major Help
format plus PDF, HTML and more. Flexible, precise, and efficient content
delivery. Try it today!. http://www.webworks.com/techwr-l
