TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Subject:Re: browseable vs browsable From:Geoff Lane <geoff -at- gjctech -dot- co -dot- uk> To:TECHWR-L <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com> Date:Wed, 23 Aug 2006 13:08:37 +0100
On Wednesday, August 23, 2006, Jessica Weissman wrote;
> Does anyone have a usage reference that supports either "browseable" or
> "browsable" to describe a set of choices?
> I have an opinion, and doubtless others do too. But I need a web or
> printed reference endorsing one or the other explicitly. Web examples
> of one form or the other are not applicable.
---
I'd have thought that neither was acceptable except as jargon. Indeed
this seems the case for right-pondians, such as myself, because the
OED lists neither.
However, "browsable" seems to have made it for left-pondians:
WebWorks ePublisher Pro for Word features support for every major Help
format plus PDF, HTML and more. Flexible, precise, and efficient content
delivery. Try it today! http://www.webworks.com/techwr-l
Easily create HTML or Microsoft Word content and convert to any popular Help file format or printed documentation. Learn more at http://www.DocToHelp.com/TechwrlList
---
You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as archive -at- infoinfocus -dot- com -dot-