TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
RE: The Documentation Being Put Through Qual Assistance Process
Subject:RE: The Documentation Being Put Through Qual Assistance Process From:"Sharon Burton" <sharon -at- anthrobytes -dot- com> To:"Ron Hearn" <RHearn -at- cucbc -dot- com>, <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com> Date:Tue, 5 Sep 2006 17:24:33 -0700
At the risk of sounding like I'm starting a flame war, why can't you meet
the deadlines? If you are scoping and then planning the amount of work, you
should be able to meet the deadlines, because you planned to create enough
docs to fit in the time available.... Just because they have a product
doesn't mean you have to write every little thing about that product.
We work closely with QA at Wonderware and it works fine. Just like
development, we enter a phase where the docs are ready to have CRs logged
against them. Then they log CRs against our docs, we fix it and move on.
But at WW, we follow a development model in int he docs group and that fits
nicely into the QA part.
sharon
Sharon Burton
CEO, Anthrobytes Consulting
951-369-8590
www.anthrobytes.com
Immediate Past President of IESTC
-----Original Message-----
On Behalf Of Ron Hearn
:::Snip:::
Even worse was an attitude toward documentation
that it is a low-level, quasi-secretarial function so there is no reason
that deadlines can't be met nor can there be the smallest error even on
a rough draft. As a lone writer, I have to rely on others' eyes to catch
the things that get past me. I've always found being under Development
works best in that I have easier access to the developers and I'm not
seen as an outsider. Having said that, I don't mind having QA review my
documents as part of the QA cycle. In fact, ideally the documentation
should drive QA, but usually doesn't
WebWorks ePublisher Pro for Word features support for every major Help
format plus PDF, HTML and more. Flexible, precise, and efficient content
delivery. Try it today! http://www.webworks.com/techwr-l
Easily create HTML or Microsoft Word content and convert to any popular Help file format or printed documentation. Learn more at http://www.DocToHelp.com/TechwrlList
---
You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as archive -at- infoinfocus -dot- com -dot-