TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Re: Evaluating Candidates Using Tests, Logic Questions, and Similar
Subject:Re: Evaluating Candidates Using Tests, Logic Questions, and Similar From:Joe Malin <jmalin -at- jmalin -dot- com> To:Karen Murri <kmurri -at- comcast -dot- net> Date:Wed, 15 Nov 2006 16:05:15 -0800
Good grief! I can not imagine being forced to take a technical writing
test by hand. If confronted with that, I would politely ask to do it on
a computer or even a typewriter. If I was refused, I would politely end
the interview.
I think a two-hour writing test has no value, since it is completely
unrelated to a tech writer's normal work activities. Either make the
test fifteen minutes, or make it take home overnight. Fifteen minutes
will tell you if someone is naturally organized and gifted; overnight
allows you to give a much harder assignment that shows more completely
the writer's overall abilities.
Here's another one: give the candidate two pages of writing to edit. If
he or she doesn't ask any questions, flunk 'em.
Joe
Karen Murri wrote:
> When I first set out to obtain a tech writing job, I applied at a firm that
> had a pretty intense writing test. Before I go into that, I have to tell you
> that I realized I loved writing AFTER I started using computers to do it.
> When I was in college (dating myself here) I HATED writing papers, and by
> association all writing. Being able to use cut and paste and drag and drop
> suited my working and thinking style immensely.
>
> So, this test had a two hour time limit and was all hand written. My carpal
> tunnel problems react much worse to handwriting than they do to typing. Two
> hours holding a pen and writing frantically just about killed me. Plus, the
> constraints of writing by hand with no time to rearrange or rewrite. . .
> Well, I didn't pass their test. I'll grant that I wasn't as good then as I
> am now, but I was a much better writer than what that test demonstrated.
>
> So the moral of the story is that writing tests can't really demonstrate the
> full range of a person's abilities, and might actually make the writer
> appear worse than they really are. Nor do they say anything about a person's
> work ethic, interpersonal skills, fit with your culture, etc. I'm not really
> opposed to writing tests, but I am skeptical.
>
> YMMV,
> -Karen
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: techwr-l-bounces+kmurri=comcast -dot- net -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
> [mailto:techwr-l-bounces+kmurri=comcast -dot- net -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com] On Behalf Of
> Gena Shurtleff
> Sent: Wednesday, November 15, 2006 1:26 PM
> To: techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
> Subject: Evaluating Candidates Using Tests, Logic Questions, and Similar
>
> Hello,
>
>
>
> On my team, we are working to improve our interview process. Our current
> process relies mostly on what technical writers (or their references) think
> their skills are and does not really give them much opportunity to exhibit
> those skills. I am looking for suggestions from other writers on effective
> ways to determine a candidate's true skill level with tools and writing
> style.
>
>
>
> Writing or Editing Tests
>
> In the past, we have used this tool but we have gotten spotty results. I
> think we could improve our process. If you have used writing or editing
> tests effectively, how did you do this? Did you administer the test during
> the interview or did you provide the candidates with the information in
> advance?
>
>
>
> Logic or Technical Questions
>
> Have any of you used "whiteboard" questions during an interview? (By
> whiteboard questions, I mean technical coding or logic questions where
> interviewees write answers on the whiteboard.) If so, what questions do you
> typically include? Have you found this to be a successful indicator of
> performance?
>
>
>
> Technical Tests
>
> Have you used technical testing or basic skill tests to verify competency
> with specific technology or tools? If so, how did you administer them? Did
> you use a service? What kind of notice did you give to the applicants? Did
> you find this to be a successful evaluation tool?
>
>
>
> I would like to include this type of content in future interviews but I
> would like to do so in a way that does not alienate potential applicants and
> in a way that helps us identify the best candidates. I appreciate any
> suggestions you may have.
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Gena
>
>
>
> Gena Shurtleff
>
> Principal Technical Writer
>
> www.originalgena.com
>
> <mailto:gena -at- originalgena -dot- com> gena -at- originalgena -dot- com
>
>
>
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>
> WebWorks ePublisher Pro for Word features support for every major Help
> format plus PDF, HTML and more. Flexible, precise, and efficient content
> delivery. Try it today! http://www.webworks.com/techwr-l
>
> Easily create HTML or Microsoft Word content and convert to any popular Help
> file format or printed documentation. Learn more at
>http://www.DocToHelp.com/TechwrlList
>
> ---
> You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as kmurri -at- comcast -dot- net -dot-
>
> To unsubscribe send a blank email to
> techwr-l-unsubscribe -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
> or visit
>http://lists.techwr-l.com/mailman/options/techwr-l/kmurri%40comcast.net
>
>
> To subscribe, send a blank email to techwr-l-join -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
>
> Send administrative questions to admin -at- techwr-l -dot- com -dot- Visit
>http://www.techwr-l.com/techwhirl/ for more resources and info.
>
>
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
WebWorks ePublisher Pro for Word features support for every major Help
format plus PDF, HTML and more. Flexible, precise, and efficient content
delivery. Try it today! http://www.webworks.com/techwr-l
Easily create HTML or Microsoft Word content and convert to any popular Help file format or printed documentation. Learn more at http://www.DocToHelp.com/TechwrlList
---
You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as archive -at- infoinfocus -dot- com -dot-