RE: Spam:RE: Evaluating Candidates Using Tests, Logic Questions, and Similar

Subject: RE: Spam:RE: Evaluating Candidates Using Tests, Logic Questions, and Similar
From: "Sarah Bouchier" <Sarah -dot- Bouchier -at- exony -dot- com>
To: <sharon -at- anthrobytes -dot- com>, "Joyce Fetterman" <Joycef -at- gtsoftware -dot- com>, <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com>
Date: Fri, 17 Nov 2006 09:58:58 -0000


>But you're interviewing for a writing job so where is the surprise? I'd
be
>surprised if you didn't know this was possible. I've had them sprung on
me
>many times

I've had it sprung on me +once+.

The interviewers gave me ten minutes to write a short piece about how to
program one of those video recorders that records by programme rather
than by time.

I almost certainly made an ooky face. I don't have one of those video
recorders. I explained this, and they insisted that I do the assignment
anyway.

I ended up hand-writing (they seemed surprised that I didn't have a
laptop with me. I didn't +own+ a laptop at the time, and even if I had
it wouldn't have occurred to me to take it to an interview) a piece of,
essentially, creative writing.

What did that tell them about me? Not a lot. It told me, however, that
I'd work in McDonald's before I worked for them.

> This is what we do - we write

But +not+ under those conditions. Not often, anyway. If the job you're
hiring for specifically requires being able to write/edit information
you don't know anything about with a fifteen minute deadline, then the
test's perfect.

If, on the other hand, it requires you to be able to write/edit normal
documentation, for which you have a context and an understanding, under
various different deadlines, while juggling tasks of various priorities;
well, that's what my portfolio's for.

I've never understood why it would be necessary to +see+ me write under
the unique conditions of an interview when the interviewer has samples
of my normal output ready to hand.

S.
Sarah Bouchier
Technical Author

exony
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

WebWorks ePublisher Pro for Word features support for every major Help
format plus PDF, HTML and more. Flexible, precise, and efficient content
delivery. Try it today! http://www.webworks.com/techwr-l

Easily create HTML or Microsoft Word content and convert to any popular Help file format or printed documentation. Learn more at http://www.DocToHelp.com/TechwrlList

---
You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as archive -at- infoinfocus -dot- com -dot-

To unsubscribe send a blank email to
techwr-l-unsubscribe -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
or visit http://lists.techwr-l.com/mailman/options/techwr-l/archive%40infoinfocus.com


To subscribe, send a blank email to techwr-l-join -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com

Send administrative questions to admin -at- techwr-l -dot- com -dot- Visit
http://www.techwr-l.com/techwhirl/ for more resources and info.


Follow-Ups:

References:
RE: Evaluating Candidates Using Tests, Logic Questions, and Similar: From: Sharon Burton

Previous by Author: RE: Other uses for Paint Shop Pro
Next by Author: RE: Spam:RE: Evaluating Candidates Using Tests, Logic Questions, and Similar
Previous by Thread: Re: Evaluating Candidates Using Tests, Logic Questions, and Similar
Next by Thread: Re: Spam:RE: Evaluating Candidates Using Tests, Logic Questions, and Similar


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:


Sponsored Ads