TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Subject:RE: Nitpicky little style question From:Beth Agnew <Beth -dot- Agnew -at- senecac -dot- on -dot- ca> To:techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com Date:Tue, 12 Dec 2006 13:13:17 -0800
That's probably what I would have said without consulting MMS. I like the
most direct route between user and instruction. At some point, if one must
refer to the interface, using the correct terminology helps educate users.
That's why we drive cars that have distributor caps instead of, I dunno,
insulated rotor covers.
While "radio buttons" nicely describes buttons that allow only one choice,
if you've never had a car radio with buttons, it becomes meaningless --
almost an arbitrary term, in the absence of context. We have enough legacy
language (hit Return, dial a number) that we have to deal with, but we're
comfortable with it. Ask any 24-year old digital native about radio buttons
and it's a different story.
My point is that we need to be aware of what makes sense to our audience,
and continually ask ourselves whether the terms in the venerated style
guides are still relevant.
-----Original Message-----
From: techwr-l-bounces+beth -dot- agnew=senecac -dot- on -dot- ca -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
[mailto:techwr-l-bounces+beth -dot- agnew=senecac -dot- on -dot- ca -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com]On
Behalf Of Milan Davidovic
Sent: Tuesday, December 12, 2006 9:49 AM
To: techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
Subject: RE: Nitpicky little style question
--- Beth Agnew <Beth -dot- Agnew -at- senecac -dot- on -dot- ca> wrote:
> Well, I'm a little tired of the World According to
> Microsoft... Why not
> figure out a style that works for your user base,
> whether it conforms to
> Microsoft or not?
Good point, but I think in this case Microsoft also
has a good point. Why say "Click the Landscape radio
button" (in the Page Setup dialog box) when "Click
Landscape" would work just as well?
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
WebWorks ePublisher Pro for Word features support for every major Help
format plus PDF, HTML and more. Flexible, precise, and efficient content
delivery. Try it today! http://www.webworks.com/techwr-l
Create HTML or Microsoft Word content and convert to Help file formats or
printed documentation. Features include single source authoring, team
authoring,
Web-based technology, and PDF output. http://www.DocToHelp.com/TechwrlList
---
You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as beth -dot- agnew -at- senecac -dot- on -dot- ca -dot-
WebWorks ePublisher Pro for Word features support for every major Help
format plus PDF, HTML and more. Flexible, precise, and efficient content
delivery. Try it today! http://www.webworks.com/techwr-l
Create HTML or Microsoft Word content and convert to Help file formats or
printed documentation. Features include single source authoring, team authoring,
Web-based technology, and PDF output. http://www.DocToHelp.com/TechwrlList
---
You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as archive -at- infoinfocus -dot- com -dot-
