RE: Something a little more useful than: RE: Pet Peeves

Subject: RE: Something a little more useful than: RE: Pet Peeves
From: Chris Borokowski <athloi -at- yahoo -dot- com>
To: techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
Date: Tue, 13 Mar 2007 11:03:47 -0700 (PDT)

My apologies for putting words into your mouth, then.
The original usage wasn't clear.

--- Fred Ridder <docudoc -at- hotmail -dot- com> wrote:

> You are putting words in my mouth. I was not
> expressing
> the "sentiment...that we do not want to be required
> to
> write in a limited language". I actually think that
> Simplified
> English (or something like it) is entirely
> appropriate and
> necessary in the industry where it is used because
> when
> you're dealing with aircraft, lives depend on clear
> and
> unambiguous communication.
>
> Steve's original posting about Simplified English
> urged us all
> to "where possible, use it". Being aware that
> Simplified English
> is a very specific subset of English for a specific
> industry (namely
> the aerospace industry), this seemed like an
> over-broad
> recommendation. My only point was that it is *not* a
> general
> purpose standard and that there will be many
> situations
> where it is not appropriate or simply impossible to
> adhere to
> its vocabulary and rules. The principles are good,
> but the
> details are too specific.
>
> Fred Ridder
>
>
> >From: Chris Borokowski <athloi -at- yahoo -dot- com>
> >To: techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
> >Subject: RE: Something a little more useful than:
> RE: Pet Peeves
> >Date: Tue, 13 Mar 2007 10:36:40 -0700 (PDT)
> >
> >
> >Good point. It shouldn't replace all English. But
> >spoken English is a subset of Standard English, and
> >breaks down into different dialects by region and
> >nation and function. Plain Language and/or
> Simplified
> >English is one standard.
> >
> >Your sentiment is one that many here will share,
> which
> >is that we do not want to be required to write in a
> >limited language. That's why the original poster
> >recommended it as a resource, not a standard. I
> think.
> >
> >--- Fred Ridder <docudoc -at- hotmail -dot- com> wrote:
> >
> > > One sentence stands out in that Wikipedia
> article
> > > you cite:
> > >
> > > "It [Simplified English] is not intended for use
> as
> > > a general
> > > writing standard."
>
>
_________________________________________________________________
> Find what you need at prices you?ll love. Compare
> products and save at MSN®
> Shopping.
>
http://shopping.msn.com/default/shp/?ptnrid=37,ptnrdata=24102&tcode=T001MSN20A0701
>
>






____________________________________________________________________________________
Finding fabulous fares is fun.
Let Yahoo! FareChase search your favorite travel sites to find flight and hotel bargains.
http://farechase.yahoo.com/promo-generic-14795097
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Create HTML or Microsoft Word content and convert to Help file formats or
printed documentation. Features include single source authoring, team authoring,
Web-based technology, and PDF output. http://www.DocToHelp.com/TechwrlList

Now shipping: Help &amp; Manual 4 with RoboHelp(r) import! New editor,
full Unicode support. Create help files, web-based help and PDF in up
to 106 languages with Help &amp; Manual: http://www.helpandmanual.com

---
You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as archive -at- web -dot- techwr-l -dot- com -dot-

To unsubscribe send a blank email to
techwr-l-unsubscribe -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
or visit http://lists.techwr-l.com/mailman/options/techwr-l/archive%40web.techwr-l.com


To subscribe, send a blank email to techwr-l-join -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com

Send administrative questions to admin -at- techwr-l -dot- com -dot- Visit
http://www.techwr-l.com/techwhirl/ for more resources and info.


References:
RE: Something a little more useful than: RE: Pet Peeves: From: Fred Ridder

Previous by Author: RE: Something a little more useful than: RE: Pet Peeves
Next by Author: Re: Do tech writers really know the truth? (Was RE: Something a little more useful than: RE: Pet Peeves)
Previous by Thread: RE: Something a little more useful than: RE: Pet Peeves
Next by Thread: RE: Something a little more useful than: RE: Pet Peeves


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:


Sponsored Ads