TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
RE: Something a little more useful than: RE: Pet Peeves
Subject:RE: Something a little more useful than: RE: Pet Peeves From:Chris Borokowski <athloi -at- yahoo -dot- com> To:techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com Date:Tue, 13 Mar 2007 11:03:47 -0700 (PDT)
My apologies for putting words into your mouth, then.
The original usage wasn't clear.
--- Fred Ridder <docudoc -at- hotmail -dot- com> wrote:
> You are putting words in my mouth. I was not
> expressing
> the "sentiment...that we do not want to be required
> to
> write in a limited language". I actually think that
> Simplified
> English (or something like it) is entirely
> appropriate and
> necessary in the industry where it is used because
> when
> you're dealing with aircraft, lives depend on clear
> and
> unambiguous communication.
>
> Steve's original posting about Simplified English
> urged us all
> to "where possible, use it". Being aware that
> Simplified English
> is a very specific subset of English for a specific
> industry (namely
> the aerospace industry), this seemed like an
> over-broad
> recommendation. My only point was that it is *not* a
> general
> purpose standard and that there will be many
> situations
> where it is not appropriate or simply impossible to
> adhere to
> its vocabulary and rules. The principles are good,
> but the
> details are too specific.
>
> Fred Ridder
>
>
> >From: Chris Borokowski <athloi -at- yahoo -dot- com>
> >To: techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
> >Subject: RE: Something a little more useful than:
> RE: Pet Peeves
> >Date: Tue, 13 Mar 2007 10:36:40 -0700 (PDT)
> >
> >
> >Good point. It shouldn't replace all English. But
> >spoken English is a subset of Standard English, and
> >breaks down into different dialects by region and
> >nation and function. Plain Language and/or
> Simplified
> >English is one standard.
> >
> >Your sentiment is one that many here will share,
> which
> >is that we do not want to be required to write in a
> >limited language. That's why the original poster
> >recommended it as a resource, not a standard. I
> think.
> >
> >--- Fred Ridder <docudoc -at- hotmail -dot- com> wrote:
> >
> > > One sentence stands out in that Wikipedia
> article
> > > you cite:
> > >
> > > "It [Simplified English] is not intended for use
> as
> > > a general
> > > writing standard."
>
>
_________________________________________________________________
> Find what you need at prices you?ll love. Compare
> products and save at MSN®
> Shopping.
> http://shopping.msn.com/default/shp/?ptnrid=37,ptnrdata=24102&tcode=T001MSN20A0701
>
>
____________________________________________________________________________________
Finding fabulous fares is fun.
Let Yahoo! FareChase search your favorite travel sites to find flight and hotel bargains. http://farechase.yahoo.com/promo-generic-14795097
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Create HTML or Microsoft Word content and convert to Help file formats or
printed documentation. Features include single source authoring, team authoring,
Web-based technology, and PDF output. http://www.DocToHelp.com/TechwrlList
Now shipping: Help & Manual 4 with RoboHelp(r) import! New editor,
full Unicode support. Create help files, web-based help and PDF in up
to 106 languages with Help & Manual: http://www.helpandmanual.com
---
You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as archive -at- web -dot- techwr-l -dot- com -dot-