RE: Pet Peeves

Subject: RE: Pet Peeves
From: Kevin McLauchlan <kmclauchlan -at- safenet-inc -dot- com>
To: techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2007 15:35:05 -0400

Avram Baskin offered:

> Sorry to jump in so late to this discussion, especially since
> the original
> topic (pet peeves) has morphed into other threads.
>
> I agree with Dori. I recently posted a questionnaire on
> TECHWR-L. One of
> the questions asked if the respondent had a "rule of thumb"
> they followed to
> determine the optimal number of items for procedure steps or
> lists. An
> early respondent replied with an explanation of the sexist
> connotation of
> "rule of thumb". I did a little research and found some of the same
> "debunking" web sites that have been referenced in this discussion.
> However, I opted to change the question (I changed "rule of thumb"
> to"guideline") because right or wrong, it was clear that some
> people believe
> the term has a sexist connotation.

Then "some people" are in _drastic_ need of a clue.
Simple as that.

They've latched onto the equivalent of an urban myth and run with it.

Do not dignify them - we and our language lose when absurdities are
propagated and dignified.

*I* am offended by knee-jerk political correctness.
I know I'm not alone.
What I _hope_ is that I'm not in the minority... especially on a list
of professional writer-editor bods, who should have some sympathy for
our poor, battered language.

For what it's worth, I've been hearing and reading "rule of thumb"
used to mean "rough working principle" or approximation or even
guideline for much, much longer than there has been a web on which
you could look it up. My good old reliable printed (as in paper)
Concise Oxford Dictionary Ninth Edition says:
rule of thumb n. a rule for general guidance, based on experience
or practice, rather than theory.

That's good enough for me.



Kevin (just checking in to the list for the daily dose of 'irate')

The information contained in this electronic mail transmission may be privileged and confidential, and therefore, protected from disclosure. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by replying to this message and deleting it from your computer without copying or disclosing it.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Create HTML or Microsoft Word content and convert to Help file formats or
printed documentation. Features include single source authoring, team authoring,
Web-based technology, and PDF output. http://www.DocToHelp.com/TechwrlList

Now shipping: Help &amp; Manual 4 with RoboHelp(r) import! New editor,
full Unicode support. Create help files, web-based help and PDF in up
to 106 languages with Help &amp; Manual: http://www.helpandmanual.com

---
You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as archive -at- web -dot- techwr-l -dot- com -dot-

To unsubscribe send a blank email to
techwr-l-unsubscribe -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
or visit http://lists.techwr-l.com/mailman/options/techwr-l/archive%40web.techwr-l.com


To subscribe, send a blank email to techwr-l-join -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com

Send administrative questions to admin -at- techwr-l -dot- com -dot- Visit
http://www.techwr-l.com/techwhirl/ for more resources and info.


Follow-Ups:

Previous by Author: RE: Something a little more useful than: RE: Pet Peeves
Next by Author: RE: Speaking of... (was RE: Pet Peeves)
Previous by Thread: Re: Pet Peeves
Next by Thread: Speaking of... (was RE: Pet Peeves)


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:


Sponsored Ads