Re: Technical writing for finance: one for the Friday files

Subject: Re: Technical writing for finance: one for the Friday files
From: Ned Bedinger <doc -at- edwordsmith -dot- com>
To: Bonnie Granat <bgranat -at- granatedit -dot- com>
Date: Mon, 28 May 2007 02:18:35 -0700


Thanks for following up, I'll try to clarify what my disagreement with
Geoff Hart is about.

This thread reminds me of the absence in techwr-l discussions, of any
definition or drawn distinction between technical communication (TC) and
technical writing (TW).

My perception here is that Geoff recently has made a number of
generalizations about things I consider to be essentially only TC, yet
he has extended the generalizations to TW as though no distinctions
matter. The disgreement erupted when I read the definition he gave for
TW (paraphrasing, TW deals with subjects that have their own jargon). I
posted to note the danger destructive reductionism (happens when
oversimplification results in the omission or breakage of important
elements. IOW, it is lossy). We've been disagreeing ever since.

I've intended the disagreement to underscore the fact that going from
generalizations about TC to specifics about TW does not work very well.
This is as it should be, right? If you're not sure, perhaps this
definition of TC will help (distilled from reading/re-reading Beth
Agnew's recent post This Too is Technical Communication):

TC is an abstraction of all jobs where technical communication skills
are used. I note that TW is much more narrowly defined than TC.

If a summary of my running disagreement with Geoff is possible, I think
it stems from my posture as TW, and his apparent posture as TC with TW
pretensions. There are other disagreements and distractions in the
thread, but I've laid out the conceptual core here.

Thanks for the concern, I appreciate the intervention, on many levels.


--Ned




> There are several definitions of technical writing floating around:
>
> 1 - Writing that explains complex technology to a non-technical audience.
> Example: Science articles in the popular press. But is this technical
> writing if the "tech" is taken out so that the average person can understand
> it?
>
> 2 - Writing that teaches people how to use complex equipment, processes, or
> software. Example: User manuals and so forth. This seems to be technical
> writing.
>
> 3 - Writing that deals with subject matter that is technical in nature and
> that is aimed at a technical audience. Example: Books or articles about
> science, medicine, technology, grammar, archaeology, music theory, history
> of painting, anthropology, and on and on, covering any subject of study that
> exists. This seems to be technical writing.
>
> 4 - Writing that deals with subject matter that is technical in nature and
> that is aimed at a non-technical audience. But is this technical writing?
> Same objection as in the first definition.
>
>
> ----------------------
>
> I would suggest that 1 and 4 are not technical writing, but 2 and 4 are. I
> don't know if this furthers the discussion or not, because I have not seen
> Ned state clearly what the disagreement is.
>
>
> Bonnie Granat
> http://www.GranatEdit.com
>
>
>
>
>
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>
> Create HTML or Microsoft Word content and convert to Help file formats or
> printed documentation. Features include support for Windows Vista & 2007
> Microsoft Office, team authoring, plus more.
> http://www.DocToHelp.com/TechwrlList
>
> Now shipping: Help &amp; Manual 4 with RoboHelp(r) import! New editor,
> full Unicode support. Create help files, web-based help and PDF in up
> to 106 languages with Help &amp; Manual: http://www.helpandmanual.com
>
> ---
> You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as doc -at- edwordsmith -dot- com -dot-
>
> To unsubscribe send a blank email to
> techwr-l-unsubscribe -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
> or visit http://lists.techwr-l.com/mailman/options/techwr-l/doc%40edwordsmith.com
>
>
> To subscribe, send a blank email to techwr-l-join -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
>
> Send administrative questions to admin -at- techwr-l -dot- com -dot- Visit
> http://www.techwr-l.com/ for more resources and info.
>
>
>
>

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Create HTML or Microsoft Word content and convert to Help file formats or
printed documentation. Features include support for Windows Vista & 2007
Microsoft Office, team authoring, plus more.
http://www.DocToHelp.com/TechwrlList

Now shipping: Help &amp; Manual 4 with RoboHelp(r) import! New editor,
full Unicode support. Create help files, web-based help and PDF in up
to 106 languages with Help &amp; Manual: http://www.helpandmanual.com

---
You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as archive -at- web -dot- techwr-l -dot- com -dot-

To unsubscribe send a blank email to
techwr-l-unsubscribe -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
or visit http://lists.techwr-l.com/mailman/options/techwr-l/archive%40web.techwr-l.com


To subscribe, send a blank email to techwr-l-join -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com

Send administrative questions to admin -at- techwr-l -dot- com -dot- Visit
http://www.techwr-l.com/ for more resources and info.


Follow-Ups:

References:
Re: Technical writing for finance: one for the Friday files: From: Stuart Burnfield
RE: Technical writing for finance: one for the Friday files: From: Bonnie Granat

Previous by Author: Jargon (was Re: Technical writing for finance: one for the Friday files)
Next by Author: Re: This too is technical communication
Previous by Thread: RE: Technical writing for finance: one for the Friday files
Next by Thread: RE: Technical writing for finance: one for the Friday files


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:


Sponsored Ads