TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Subject:Re: This too is technical communication From:"Gene Kim-Eng" <techwr -at- genek -dot- com> To:<techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com> Date:Fri, 1 Jun 2007 13:45:17 -0700
I think it is a common misconception that a small company that
does not implement the same solutions as General Motors or
the DoD must be "immature." Not every small company aspires
to grow into a big company or to be bought by one someday.
I have seen more than one small company spend itself into the
ground trying to implement "big company" enterprise solutions
that they would never need. Conversely, I have also seen
small companies outgrow their "small company" processes
and realize too late that they should have implemented ones
that were less dependent upon individuals working one-on-one.
I think that a key part, if not the biggest part, of "maturing" a
company is having a vision of where you want the company to
go and where you do not want it to go, and building infrastructure,
processes and knowledge sets that will get you there without
impeding progress or causing it to be distracted by the lure of
bright, shiny toys that don't do anything to advance your goals.
> It also does not surprise me that a small company can in fact implement efficient documentation processes. In fact, smaller
> companies should have an easier time implementing consistency versus larger companies with numerous competing agendas. It also
> bodes well that efficiency allows more time to do other things in your case.
>
> The same principle works in larger companies. Only, so far all I've seen for many years is understaffed documentation groups
> versus the size of the development team and the ever-expanding content domain. Implementing a more efficient documentation system
> in these contexts means only that we have more time to work on content, our core competency, versus say formatting, DTP, or other
> presentation type tasks.
>
> I do think your case is a rarity. Or maybe most small companies start with efficient documentation architectures and policies and
> then get messy later with more people on board. I doubt it, though.
Create HTML or Microsoft Word content and convert to Help file formats or
printed documentation. Features include support for Windows Vista & 2007
Microsoft Office, team authoring, plus more. http://www.DocToHelp.com/TechwrlList
Now shipping: Help & Manual 4 with RoboHelp(r) import! New editor,
full Unicode support. Create help files, web-based help and PDF in up
to 106 languages with Help & Manual: http://www.helpandmanual.com
---
You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as archive -at- web -dot- techwr-l -dot- com -dot-