RE: Why you shouldn't re-read already submitted stuff

Subject: RE: Why you shouldn't re-read already submitted stuff
From: "Lauren" <lt34 -at- csus -dot- edu>
To: "'Combs, Richard'" <richard -dot- combs -at- Polycom -dot- com>, "'TECHWR-L'" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com>
Date: Thu, 7 Jun 2007 12:44:56 -0700

Que?

Original text: "...the contracts that we have obtained in the past ... show
clearly
that we 1) have the experience ... and b) that we can handle ...."

1. "...the contracts that we have obtained in the past ... show clearly
that we 1) have the experience ... and b) that we can handle .... <and iii)
we are great proofreaders.>"

2. "...the contracts that we have obtained in the past ... show clearly
that we 1) have the experience ... and b) that we can handle .... <and we
are great iii) proofreaders.>

How convoluted can this get?

We [...] have the experience...
We [...] that we can handle...
We [...] we are great proofreaders...
We [...] proofreaders...

Oh sigh. 1, b, iii, ieieiei...

So Susan, was the proposal approved?

Lauren


> -----Original Message-----
> From: techwr-l-bounces+lt34=csus -dot- edu -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
> [mailto:techwr-l-bounces+lt34=csus -dot- edu -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com] On
> Behalf Of Combs, Richard
> Sent: Thursday, June 07, 2007 12:35 PM
> To: TECHWR-L
> Subject: RE: Why you shouldn't re-read already submitted stuff
>
> Lauren wrote:
>
> > I didn't catch it on the first pass, "What's wrong? There's
> > subject and verb agreement." I didn't even see the
> > numbering. "And iii) we are great proofreaders."
>
> You mean, "And we are great iii) proofreaders." :-)
>
> Richard
>
>
> ------
> Richard G. Combs
> Senior Technical Writer
> Polycom, Inc.
> richardDOTcombs AT polycomDOTcom
> 303-223-5111
> ------
> rgcombs AT gmailDOTcom
> 303-777-0436
> ------
>
>
>
>
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>
> Create HTML or Microsoft Word content and convert to Help
> file formats or
> printed documentation. Features include support for Windows
> Vista & 2007
> Microsoft Office, team authoring, plus more.
> http://www.DocToHelp.com/TechwrlList
>
> True single source, conditional content, PDF export, modular help.
> Help & Manual is the most powerful authoring tool for technical
> documentation. Boost your productivity! http://www.helpandmanual.com
>
> ---
> You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as lt34 -at- csus -dot- edu -dot-
>
> To unsubscribe send a blank email to
> techwr-l-unsubscribe -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
> or visit
> http://lists.techwr-l.com/mailman/options/techwr-l/lt34%40csus.edu
>
>
> To subscribe, send a blank email to techwr-l-join -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
>
> Send administrative questions to admin -at- techwr-l -dot- com -dot- Visit
> http://www.techwr-l.com/ for more resources and info.

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Create HTML or Microsoft Word content and convert to Help file formats or
printed documentation. Features include support for Windows Vista & 2007
Microsoft Office, team authoring, plus more.
http://www.DocToHelp.com/TechwrlList

True single source, conditional content, PDF export, modular help.
Help & Manual is the most powerful authoring tool for technical
documentation. Boost your productivity! http://www.helpandmanual.com

---
You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as archive -at- web -dot- techwr-l -dot- com -dot-

To unsubscribe send a blank email to
techwr-l-unsubscribe -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
or visit http://lists.techwr-l.com/mailman/options/techwr-l/archive%40web.techwr-l.com


To subscribe, send a blank email to techwr-l-join -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com

Send administrative questions to admin -at- techwr-l -dot- com -dot- Visit
http://www.techwr-l.com/ for more resources and info.


References:
RE: Why you shouldn't re-read already submitted stuff: From: Combs, Richard

Previous by Author: RE: Organizational chart
Next by Author: RE: Organizational chart
Previous by Thread: RE: Why you shouldn't re-read already submitted stuff
Next by Thread: Re: Why you shouldn't re-read already submitted stuff


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:


Sponsored Ads