TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Mark Levinson disagreed with my comment that and/or was imprecise
because it had three different meanings: <<No... Do you have
examples? To me, they seem all to mean the same thing, and to mean
it more precisely than a bare "and" that expects us to intuit "or
either one of them" or a bare "or" that expects us to intuit "or both
of them together".>>
No examples off the top of my head, but I come across situations all
the time in my editing (science) where the meaning is simply unclear:
as I noted in my previous post, sometimes my authors mean "and",
sometimes "or", and sometimes both. If it's sufficiently important to
you, I can go digging through my archives to find examples. Meantime,
I hope a few words from Garner's (2003) modern American usage will
suffice: "To avoid ambiguity, don't use it... _Or_ alone usually
suffices..." He then gives the example of "A or B or both" that I
proposed as an exception.
My second objection to and/or is the use of the /, which has no
standard meaning in current English. It's gradually developing one
for phrases such as and/or (to mean an alternative), and it's
gradually replacing the en dash in compounds such as author/editor,
but we're not yet at the point that I consider it standard.
Bottom line for me? If the word can mean either "and" or "or", don't
you think it's our editorial responsibility to help the author make
up their mind? "And" and "or" don't overlap, and shouldn't. Why lose
a useful distinction just because the author is too lazy to make up
their mind?
----------------------------------------------------
-- Geoff Hart
ghart -at- videotron -dot- ca / geoffhart -at- mac -dot- com
www.geoff-hart.com
--------------------------------------------------
***Now available*** _Effective onscreen editing_
(http://www.geoff-hart.com/home/onscreen-book.htm)
Create HTML or Microsoft Word content and convert to Help file formats or
printed documentation. Features include support for Windows Vista & 2007
Microsoft Office, team authoring, plus more. http://www.DocToHelp.com/TechwrlList
True single source, conditional content, PDF export, modular help.
Help & Manual is the most powerful authoring tool for technical
documentation. Boost your productivity! http://www.helpandmanual.com
---
You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as archive -at- web -dot- techwr-l -dot- com -dot-