TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
> If writing ambiguously on purpose is not prohibited in the STC's Code of
> Ethics for Technical Writers, it should be. If STC does not have a Code
> of Ethics for Technical Writers, it should.
> Dori Green
> From: Peter Neilson <neilson -at- windstream -dot- net>
>
> The concern in writing marketing materials or sales scripts is not that
> information be conveyed accurately or completely, but that an emotional
> environment conducive to a sale be created.
>
> Andrew Warren wrote:
> > V Suresh wrote:
> > ...
> >> It actually leaves a customer helpless if they ever get into
> >> a hassle with the bank.
> >>
> >> If you ask me, the Banks by using such ambiguous words can
> >> easily get away from any tight corners.
> >
> > I don't see that. The loan isn't approved until the bank
> > says it is; "approved in principle" is no more harmful to
> > the applicant than "nearing approval", "not yet approved",
> > or "awaiting approval".
> >
> >> Isn?t there a need to give more clarity to a customer than
> >> that?
> >
> > The sentence only lacks clarity if the reader is unfamiliar
> > with the phrase "in principle". If the reader knows the
> > phrase, it actually ADDS clarity.
> > I guess the bank could simplify the language in the loan-
> > approval letter, but the customer's eventually going to
> > have to read the loan docs, and the language is MUCH more
> > complicated there. Simplifying the letter isn't going to
> > do much to improve a customer's overall comprehension of
> > the system.
> From: Ned Bedinger <doc -at- edwordsmith -dot- com>
> In general, when a business sector characteristically obscures important
> information with ambiguous words, I don't like it. I take a dim view of
> it. Sometimes I might see that the ambiguity hss been introduced by a
> writer who doesn't understand the subject matter, but that's a different
> matter.
...
> The financial industry in the United States has been under fire in
> recent years for creating consumer documentation that requires, in the
> words of Senator Carl Levin, a 27th-grade education to comprehend.
>
> At Sen. Levin's request, the General Accounting Office (GAO) undertook a
> study of the credit card industry, and found that the terms of credit
> card agreements are written at a 10th-12th grade level, well above the
> 8th-grade level at which half of US adults read.
>
> See the full report, which discusses the results found by readability
> consultants:
>
>http://www.gao.gov/new.items/d06929.pdf
>
> BTW, Sen. Levin's committee held hearings about this and other credit
> card practices. One public hearing featured credit card company
> executives in attendance to answer question, and it was a spectacle
> worthy of the Roman forum. Levin read, for a solid minute, from the
> text of an agreement from a major credit card company, and then asked
> one of the executives if he believed that credit card holders knew what
> it meant. The exec stated that yes, he thought most of them did. The
> audience erupted in gales of derisive laughter.
>
> TW tie-in: This might be a good example of how to make document reviews
> more popular and entertaining, but not if you're prone to blushing.
>
> Ned Bedinger
> doc -at- edwordsmith -dot- com
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Create HTML or Microsoft Word content and convert to Help file formats or
printed documentation. Features include support for Windows Vista & 2007
Microsoft Office, team authoring, plus more. http://www.DocToHelp.com/TechwrlList
True single source, conditional content, PDF export, modular help.
Help & Manual is the most powerful authoring tool for technical
documentation. Boost your productivity! http://www.helpandmanual.com
---
You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as archive -at- web -dot- techwr-l -dot- com -dot-