RE: STC is broken

Subject: RE: STC is broken
From: "Dan Goldstein" <DGoldstein -at- riverainmedical -dot- com>
To: <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com>
Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2008 13:26:14 -0400

(I really shouldn't do this...)

If the following doesn't specifically exclude more than 5% of
TECHWR-Lers, I'll be happy. If someone can suggest changes that clarify
the definition without excluding anyone else, I'll be even happier.

"Technical writers create and modify documentation about processes,
products, and services of a scientific or technological nature. The
documentation almost always includes text, and often also includes
graphics. Technical writers are able to organize and present information
provided by others who have specific technical expertise. They are able
to learn new technologies, both in the subject matter that they are
documenting and in the tools that they use to present it. They are able
to modify the documentation according to the needs of the target
audience, as well as the needs of the organizations for which they
work."

(Not grinning - just ducking and running)

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Beth Agnew
> Sent: Wednesday, April 30, 2008 1:01 PM
> To: techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
> Subject: Re: STC is broken
>
> My apologies -- my facetious reply should have had a
> little more explanation. That definition you point
> to is exactly the one the "new" definition is
> supposed to replace. Since it's been a year (Apr
> 2007), it looks like they haven't yet been successful
> in doing so. Like most of our profession-related
> topics, especially where definitions and parameters
> are concerned, it is going to be dashedly hard to
> get us to agree...
>

This message contains confidential information intended only for the use of the addressee(s). If you are not the addressee, or the person responsible for delivering it to the addressee, you are hereby notified that reading, disseminating, distributing, copying, electronic storing or the taking of any action in reliance on the contents of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message by mistake, please notify us, by replying to the sender, and delete the original message immediately thereafter. Thank you.

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Create HTML or Microsoft Word content and convert to Help file formats or
printed documentation. Features include support for Windows Vista & 2007
Microsoft Office, team authoring, plus more.
http://www.DocToHelp.com/TechwrlList

True single source, conditional content, PDF export, modular help.
Help & Manual is the most powerful authoring tool for technical
documentation. Boost your productivity! http://www.helpandmanual.com

---
You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as archive -at- web -dot- techwr-l -dot- com -dot-

To unsubscribe send a blank email to
techwr-l-unsubscribe -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
or visit http://lists.techwr-l.com/mailman/options/techwr-l/archive%40web.techwr-l.com


To subscribe, send a blank email to techwr-l-join -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com

Send administrative questions to admin -at- techwr-l -dot- com -dot- Visit
http://www.techwr-l.com/ for more resources and info.


Follow-Ups:

References:
STC is broken: From: Joel Wilhelm
Re: STC is broken: From: Ealasaid A. Haas
RE: STC is broken: From: richard.melanson
RE: STC is broken: From: McLauchlan, Kevin
RE: STC is broken: From: David Hailey
Re: STC is broken: From: Rob Hudson
RE: STC is broken: From: David Hailey
Re: STC is broken: From: Beth Agnew
RE: STC is broken: From: Dan Goldstein
Re: STC is broken: From: Beth Agnew
RE: STC is broken: From: Dan Goldstein
Re: STC is broken: From: Beth Agnew

Previous by Author: RE: STC is broken
Next by Author: RE: STC is broken
Previous by Thread: Re: STC is broken
Next by Thread: RE: STC is broken


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:


Sponsored Ads