TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Subject:Re: Definition of Tech Writer, was STC is broken From:"Gene Kim-Eng" <techwr -at- genek -dot- com> To:<techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com> Date:Wed, 30 Apr 2008 18:38:42 -0700
>From where I sit as someone who frequently has to justify the
budgets to hire people, corporate management looks for
"writers" because the vast majority of documentation consists
of words, and the small component that does not is looked
upon as something that substitutes for words, or serves as
a different mean of delivering words. There is a reason why
the people who create movie scripts, music, radio ads, etc.,
are called "writers" even though they often create things that
their intended audience never reads. The "core competency"
is the ability to deliver information using fewer words and
smoother words than the engineers and techs can, in less
time and for less cost than it would take for them to make
the engineers do it. You can all go ahead and pick some
other title to put up at the tops of your resumes if you want,
but there still better be "technical writer/writing" somewhere
in the body, or you can look forward to finding yourselves
being passed over by all the keyword searches, and spending
half the time you devote to selling yourselves to explaining
how whatever title you're calling yourself still means "technical
writer.".
Gene Kim-Eng
----- Original Message -----
From: "Beth Agnew" <beth -dot- agnew -at- senecac -dot- on -dot- ca>
>I think the terminology does need to evolve in that direction. Employers
> look for writers or even technical writers because that's traditionally
> been the title of people who have performed those functions. It worked
> in the 20th century but is insufficient for 21st century information age
> needs. The lines are indeed blurry, but I think there are some core
> competencies that we could identify as being the hallmarks of that
> creature the Technical Communicator that other types of writers or
> communicators or technical people do not possess. If we could agree on
> those, she says idealistically, perhaps we'd have an easier time on the
> advocacy and PR side of things.
Create HTML or Microsoft Word content and convert to Help file formats or
printed documentation. Features include support for Windows Vista & 2007
Microsoft Office, team authoring, plus more. http://www.DocToHelp.com/TechwrlList
True single source, conditional content, PDF export, modular help.
Help & Manual is the most powerful authoring tool for technical
documentation. Boost your productivity! http://www.helpandmanual.com
---
You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as archive -at- web -dot- techwr-l -dot- com -dot-