RE: Honestly -- when an SME completely REWRITES your text ... GEEZ!

Subject: RE: Honestly -- when an SME completely REWRITES your text ... GEEZ!
From: "Downing, David" <DavidDowning -at- users -dot- com>
To: <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com>
Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2008 08:40:32 -0500

I thought everyone might be interest to know how I handled this and how
it turned out. I tried to revise the test to use the best parts of what
he gave me and what I had already. Then I sent it to him with the email
below -- which I've snipped a little to remove some material that might
be considered proprietary. He ended up approving the revision with no
further changes. I can't say we all lived happily ever after, because
this is the real world, but this particular incident turned out well.

Here's the email I sent him. Not the one rather interesting
slepp-checker blooper where I picked the wrong word from the list of
corrections. The word I wanted was "verbatim." I'm wondering if he took
any weird alternative meaning from what I actually said.

------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------

Here's what I cam up with as the revised text for the [snip] Table.
This is a kind of hybrid of what you sent me and what was there. Your
text included some I important points I missed, such as [snip]. However,
I couldn't use it verboten because it wasn't in line with our department
style. Furthermore, I thought some points were better placed in an
introductory section, rather than in the discussion of the fields. I
also felt that in some places where you referred to the [snip] code, the
reference should really be to the table entry, since we're talking about
the actually [snip] data, not just the code. I also had some passages I
really want to keep from my original. This has created some redundancy,
but I figured it would ultimately be up to our editor how to resolve
this.

Please let me know how this works for you.

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

ComponentOne Doc-To-Help 2009 is your all-in-one authoring and publishing
solution. Author in Doc-To-Help's XML-based editor, Microsoft Word or
HTML and publish to the Web, Help systems or printed manuals.
http://www.doctohelp.com

True single source, conditional content, PDF export, modular help.
Help & Manual is the most powerful authoring tool for technical
documentation. Boost your productivity! http://www.helpandmanual.com

---
You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as archive -at- web -dot- techwr-l -dot- com -dot-

To unsubscribe send a blank email to
techwr-l-unsubscribe -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
or visit http://lists.techwr-l.com/mailman/options/techwr-l/archive%40web.techwr-l.com


To subscribe, send a blank email to techwr-l-join -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com

Send administrative questions to admin -at- techwr-l -dot- com -dot- Visit
http://www.techwr-l.com/ for more resources and info.

Please move off-topic discussions to the Chat list, at:
http://lists.techwr-l.com/mailman/listinfo/techwr-l-chat


Follow-Ups:

Previous by Author: RE: wisdom from freelancers
Next by Author: RE: Honestly -- when an SME completely REWRITES your text ... GEEZ!
Previous by Thread: RE: Honestly -- when an SME completely REWRITES your text ... GEEZ!
Next by Thread: RE: Honestly -- when an SME completely REWRITES your text ... GEEZ!


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:


Sponsored Ads