RE: Justified versus ragged right

Subject: RE: Justified versus ragged right
From: Fred Ridder <docudoc -at- hotmail -dot- com>
To: <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com>
Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2008 10:38:07 -0400


David Downing wrote:

> Seems as of every time this question comes up, everyone is unanimous in
> preferring ragged right for all the reasons that have been given, which
> prompts me to ask two questions:

You've misinterpreted or misunderstood the responses. The preference
that was stated was for ragged right vs. the crude kind of justification
implemented by desktop word processing tools. Achieving justification
by adjusting only the spaces between words is aesthetically displeasing,
causes white "rivers" in the text, and degrades readability.

> First, is there, in fact, any argument to defend justified text, other
> than the fact that it makes for a nice, neat block on the page?
There is nothing wrong with *well done* justification. But no desktop
application (with the possible exception of InDesign) has a sophisticated
enough typographic engine to do a good job of justification.

> Second, how did justified text get to be the standard for published
> books?

Because there's nothing wrong with it *if it's done well* and it looks
good. Book publishers can afford to spend the kind of money that
a professional H&J (hyphenation and justification) tool costs because
the cost is spread across a large number of revenue-generating
deliverables. And for the same reason, they can afford to employ
operators who really understand the H&J process and the tradeoffs
involved so that they can achieve good looking results. A dumb
justification tool in inexperienced hands produces ugly results.

-Fred Ridder


^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

ComponentOne Doc-To-Help 2009 is your all-in-one authoring and publishing
solution. Author in Doc-To-Help's XML-based editor, Microsoft Word or
HTML and publish to the Web, Help systems or printed manuals.
http://www.doctohelp.com

Help & Manual 5: The complete help authoring tool for individual
authors and teams. Professional power, intuitive interface. Write
once, publish to 8 formats. Multi-user authoring and version control! http://www.helpandmanual.com/

---
You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as archive -at- web -dot- techwr-l -dot- com -dot-

To unsubscribe send a blank email to
techwr-l-unsubscribe -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
or visit http://lists.techwr-l.com/mailman/options/techwr-l/archive%40web.techwr-l.com


To subscribe, send a blank email to techwr-l-join -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com

Send administrative questions to admin -at- techwr-l -dot- com -dot- Visit
http://www.techwr-l.com/ for more resources and info.

Please move off-topic discussions to the Chat list, at:
http://lists.techwr-l.com/mailman/listinfo/techwr-l-chat


Follow-Ups:

References:
RE: Justified versus ragged right: From: Downing, David

Previous by Author: RE: Curly quotes in Frame cross-references
Next by Author: RE: Justified versus ragged right? (take II)
Previous by Thread: Re: Justified versus ragged right
Next by Thread: RE: Justified versus ragged right


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:


Sponsored Ads