RE: Being more careful with the wide brushes, was: RE: Qualifications for an off shore writer?

Subject: RE: Being more careful with the wide brushes, was: RE: Qualifications for an off shore writer?
From: "Leonard C. Porrello" <Leonard -dot- Porrello -at- SoleraTec -dot- com>
To: "Gregory P Sweet" <gps03 -at- health -dot- state -dot- ny -dot- us>, <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com>
Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2009 08:55:29 -0800

Amen, brother.

Leonard

-----Original Message-----
From: techwr-l-bounces+leonard -dot- porrello=soleratec -dot- com -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com [mailto:techwr-l-bounces+leonard -dot- porrello=soleratec -dot- com -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com] On Behalf Of Gregory P Sweet
Sent: Thursday, February 19, 2009 8:46 AM
To: techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
Subject: Being more careful with the wide brushes,was: RE: Qualifications for an off shore writer?

Keith,

I am an educator and technical writer. I find your assertion that education
does not make one smarter deeply offensive. More offensive still was that
when you were called out on this nonsense you followed up with a threat.

Feel free to rant as you wish, I'll say no more on the subject. I am just
responding to your words: A broad-brush insult, followed by a threat.

-Greg

techwr-l-bounces+gps03=health -dot- state -dot- ny -dot- us -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com wrote on
02/18/2009 10:28:06 PM:

> My reaction to your first sentence was to think that you were
> perhaps attempting to mock either me or my grandfather's thought by
> restating my words in such a grotesque manner. Since you have
> apparently never before been introduced to the concept, I will do
> you the favor of telling you that most people, when their words are
> parodied back to them in an overtly twisted manner, will react
> negatively because they will perceive it as a mockery.
>
> I did not disparage education. I disparaged the erroneous idea which
> too many people hold that education and intelligence are the same
> thing. Your categorization of the meaning of my words is totally
> erroneous. You projected what you wanted to think onto my words and
> then replied to your internal version of my words instead of
> responding to what I actually wrote.
>
> To top it off, you now have the gall to try to tell me what I was
> thinking. What is this "only grounds" garbage? I will thank you in
> the future to refrain from these ludicrous attempts at amateur mind
> reading. Try replying to my words, not to what you think you have
> magically divined to be my inner thoughts.
>
>
> --- On Wed, 2/18/09, Leonard C. Porrello <Leonard.
> Porrello -at- SoleraTec -dot- com> wrote:
>
> From: Leonard C. Porrello <Leonard -dot- Porrello -at- SoleraTec -dot- com>
> Subject: RE: Qualifications for an off shore writer?
> To: "Keith Hood" <klhra -at- yahoo -dot- com>, "TECHWR-L"
<techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com>
> Date: Wednesday, February 18, 2009, 11:24 AM
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> While the first sentence was tongue in
> cheek, I ultimately intended neither a joke nor an insult. Knowledgeof
grammar
> and usage comes only through education (formal or informal). And as you
> illustrate by the umbrage you took to what I wrote,  you yourself believe
> that someone who uses "poor" grammar and usage is less than
> intelligent. Consequently, as in your first message, I see a
contradiction. In
> your first message, you disparage education, but you do so using perfect
> grammar and usage-which comes only from education. In your second
> message, you indicate (by tone) that you were offended by what I
wrote-and
> the only grounds for that is that what I wrote sounded uneducated.
>
>
>
> Where education is defined as, "the
> act or process of ... acquiring general knowledge, developing the powers
of
> reasoning and judgment, and generally of preparing oneself or others
> intellectually for mature life," education does make people smarter.
> Education is to the mind what good diet, aerobics, and weight training
are to
> the body. This, at least, is the classical view. In contrast, the
> Romantic view
> lauds man in a "state of nature," uncorrupted by the influences of
> culture and "edumacation."
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> From: Keith Hood
> [mailto:klhra -at- yahoo -dot- com]
>
> Sent: Tuesday, February 17, 2009
> 7:25 PM
>
> To: TECHWR-L; jleer -at- leertech -dot- net;
> Leonard C. Porrello
>
> Subject: RE: Qualifications for an
> off shore writer?
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> I require a clarification from you. If you meant
> your words as a joke of some kind and not as an insult to my
grandfather or
> myself, it would be a very good idea for you to make that clear now.
>
>
>
>
>
> --- On Tue, 2/17/09, Leonard C. Porrello
<Leonard -dot- Porrello -at- SoleraTec -dot- com>
> wrote:
>
>
> From: Leonard C. Porrello <Leonard -dot- Porrello -at- SoleraTec -dot- com>
>
> Subject: RE: Qualifications for an off shore writer?
>
> To: "Keith Hood" <klhra -at- yahoo -dot- com>, "TECHWR-L"
> <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com>, jleer -at- leertech -dot- net
>
> Date: Tuesday, February 17, 2009, 7:42 PM
>
> Didn't you mean,
> "Edumacation ain't make you none smarter"?  Even so, where
> "education" is, "the act or process of ... acquiring general
> knowledge, developing the powers of reasoning and judgment, and
generally of
> preparing oneself or others intellectually for mature life," isn't the
> statement a bit of an oxymoron?
>
>
>
> Leonard
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
>
> From:
techwr-l-bounces+leonard -dot- porrello=soleratec -dot- com -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
>
[mailto:techwr-l-bounces+leonard -dot- porrello=soleratec -dot- com -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com]
> On Behalf Of Keith Hood
>
> Sent: Tuesday, February 17, 2009 4:36 PM
>
> To: TECHWR-L; jleer -at- leertech -dot- net
>
> Subject: RE: Qualifications for an off shore writer?
>
>
>
> Yes, having a degree has never been proof of anything except the
ability to
> know how to get by on tests. As my grandfather used to say and
> he's never been
> proven wrong, more education does not make you smarter.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>
> ComponentOne Doc-To-Help 2009 is your all-in-one authoring and publishing

> solution. Author in Doc-To-Help's XML-based editor, Microsoft Word or
> HTML and publish to the Web, Help systems or printed manuals.
> http://www.doctohelp.com
>
> Help & Manual 5: The complete help authoring tool for individual
> authors and teams. Professional power, intuitive interface. Write
> once, publish to 8 formats. Multi-user authoring and version control!
> http://www.helpandmanual.com/
>
> ---
> You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as gps03 -at- health -dot- state -dot- ny -dot- us -dot-
>
> To unsubscribe send a blank email to
> techwr-l-unsubscribe -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
> or visit http://lists.techwr-l.com/mailman/options/techwr-l/gps03%
> 40health.state.ny.us
>
>
> To subscribe, send a blank email to techwr-l-join -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
>
> Send administrative questions to admin -at- techwr-l -dot- com -dot- Visit
> http://www.techwr-l.com/ for more resources and info.
>
> Please move off-topic discussions to the Chat list, at:
> http://lists.techwr-l.com/mailman/listinfo/techwr-l-chat
>
IMPORTANT NOTICE: This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential or sensitive information which is, or may be, legally privileged or otherwise protected by law from further disclosure. It is intended only for the addressee. If you received this in error or from someone who was not authorized to send it to you, please do not distribute, copy or use it or any attachments. Please notify the sender immediately by reply e-mail and delete this from your system. Thank you for your cooperation.

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

ComponentOne Doc-To-Help 2009 is your all-in-one authoring and publishing
solution. Author in Doc-To-Help's XML-based editor, Microsoft Word or
HTML and publish to the Web, Help systems or printed manuals.
http://www.doctohelp.com

Help & Manual 5: The complete help authoring tool for individual
authors and teams. Professional power, intuitive interface. Write
once, publish to 8 formats. Multi-user authoring and version control! http://www.helpandmanual.com/

---
You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as Leonard -dot- Porrello -at- soleratec -dot- com -dot-

To unsubscribe send a blank email to
techwr-l-unsubscribe -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
or visit http://lists.techwr-l.com/mailman/options/techwr-l/leonard.porrello%40soleratec.com


To subscribe, send a blank email to techwr-l-join -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com

Send administrative questions to admin -at- techwr-l -dot- com -dot- Visit
http://www.techwr-l.com/ for more resources and info.

Please move off-topic discussions to the Chat list, at:
http://lists.techwr-l.com/mailman/listinfo/techwr-l-chat

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

ComponentOne Doc-To-Help 2009 is your all-in-one authoring and publishing
solution. Author in Doc-To-Help's XML-based editor, Microsoft Word or
HTML and publish to the Web, Help systems or printed manuals.
http://www.doctohelp.com

Help & Manual 5: The complete help authoring tool for individual
authors and teams. Professional power, intuitive interface. Write
once, publish to 8 formats. Multi-user authoring and version control! http://www.helpandmanual.com/

---
You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as archive -at- web -dot- techwr-l -dot- com -dot-

To unsubscribe send a blank email to
techwr-l-unsubscribe -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
or visit http://lists.techwr-l.com/mailman/options/techwr-l/archive%40web.techwr-l.com


To subscribe, send a blank email to techwr-l-join -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com

Send administrative questions to admin -at- techwr-l -dot- com -dot- Visit
http://www.techwr-l.com/ for more resources and info.

Please move off-topic discussions to the Chat list, at:
http://lists.techwr-l.com/mailman/listinfo/techwr-l-chat


References:
RE: Qualifications for an off shore writer?: From: Keith Hood
Being more careful with the wide brushes, was: RE: Qualifications for an off shore writer?: From: Gregory P Sweet

Previous by Author: RE: Qualifications for an off shore writer?
Next by Author: RE: Qualifications for an off shore writer?
Previous by Thread: Being more careful with the wide brushes, was: RE: Qualifications for an off shore writer?
Next by Thread: Re: Being more careful with the wide brushes, was: RE: Qualifications for an off shore writer?


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:


Sponsored Ads