TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
> Um, when they describe the exact job you are currently doing, that's
> not an exact match? Perhaps they had additional but unstated criteria.
> "Must NEVER have used Lisp, Smalltalk, or Ruby." And you've mentioned
> them.
There's more to being a good fit for a job than being able to check all the boxes on the skills
list.
For instance, if you've had 6 jobs in the last 5 years, and the job I'm hiring for has a
substantial learning curve, you'll be tossed into the "no" pile. If you made $100K at your last
three jobs, and the job I am hiring for is significantly less, you'll be tossed into the "no" pile.
These are just two examples -- there are many red flags that warn me you may not be a
good fit.
All I am saying is folks are trying to over analyze why they weren't called for an interview for a
job that, **in their minds**, was a perfect fit. Face it, we *all* think we are good writers and
have top-notch skills that "anyone in their right mind would be a fool to turn down". That's just
one perspective, and obviously not the perspective of the hiring manager or the outcome
would have been different.
Bottom line -- If you apply for a job, are not called for an interview, and the position is posted
again four weeks later, it is highly likely no good candidates were found in the first round,
including yourself.
2 cents, from the hiring side....
Dana W.
***************************
Dana Worley
Software Product Manager/Manager, Software Support Group
Campbell Scientific, Inc.
dana -at- campbellsci -dot- com
Free Software Documentation Project Web Cast: Covers developing Table of
Contents, Context IDs, and Index, as well as Doc-To-Help
2009 tips, tricks, and best practices. http://www.doctohelp.com/SuperPages/Webcasts/
Help & Manual 5: The complete help authoring tool for individual
authors and teams. Professional power, intuitive interface. Write
once, publish to 8 formats. Multi-user authoring and version control! http://www.helpandmanual.com/
---
You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as archive -at- web -dot- techwr-l -dot- com -dot-