TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Re: Source for statistics on the technical writing field
Subject:Re: Source for statistics on the technical writing field From:Elaine Garnet <2egarnet -at- rogers -dot- com> To:Peter Neilson <neilson -at- windstream -dot- net> Date:Mon, 3 Aug 2009 09:38:25 -0400
Good grief Peter - 27 and a hair pattern? I am 61 and not everyone
works in the computer field. I am still interested in the stats, John.
On 3-Aug-09, at 9:30 AM, Peter Neilson wrote:
> In my jaundiced opinion almost none of those parameters are useful for
> anything that can or should be done, with the possible exception of
> granting a PhD in a subject that I would prefer to avoid studying.
>
> What does matter is the trend, slightly obvious to those in the field,
> for traditional tech writing to be replaced by "something else."
>
> When the older writers of TECHWR-L started there was more tech writing
> to be done than could possibly be accomplished. Computer-human
> interfaces were atrocious, and if you didn't RTFM, you were sunk. If
> nobody WTFM, you were on your own.
>
> Now the interfaces are decidely better. The Fine Manual, if it even
> exists, is rarely needed. Some "help" systems are even actually
> helpful.
>
> When the manual is needed, to fulfill a requirement or because the
> humans still need to understand a goodly body of knowledge, it's often
> prepared by people who are not tech writers. (But that happened back
> in
> our Dark Ages, too.)
>
> The age of tech writers themselves means nearly nothing. I, myself,
> feel
> I am 27 years old I but have the hair pattern and the experience to
> have
> accomplished more than can be fitted into five years of career. In the
> wisdom department I combine the mind of a sage and the curiosity of an
> eight-year-old. Or is it the opposite?
>
> Back to the list of statistics. I think the most distressing part is
> the
> "large corporations" aspect. Which ones? In what phase of their
> operations? Are we comparing apples to oranges, to prunes, or to
> steamboats? The looseness of the parameters suggests the best bet
> might
> be to state the conclusions desired, and then to select the statistics
> required for support. Is this part of a plan for some massive
> government
> program?
>
> john rosberg wrote:
>>
>> Tech Writer of the Beast wrote . . . .
>>
>>> I would like to obtain some good statistics on the following:
>>>
>>> Average age?of employed technical writers at large corporations.
>>> Length of time technical writers commonly stay in the field.
>>> Average age of new hires at large corporations and whether it has
>>> changed since 2000.
>>> Wage declines (or increases) for technical writers at large
>>> corporations over, say, the last decade or perhaps since 2000.
>>> Decrease in numbers of technical writers at large corporations
>>> since 2000.
>>> Outsourcing of technical writing positions since 2000, including
>>> information about the countries to which the jobs are outsourced.
>>> Anyone know what is the best bet for reliable information on such
>>> things?
>>> ?
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> I suspect you may receive a little more data if you gave some idea
>> about the use to which you wil to put this information, and who you
>> are.
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>
> Free Software Documentation Project Web Cast: Covers developing
> Table of
> Contents, Context IDs, and Index, as well as Doc-To-Help
> 2009 tips, tricks, and best practices.
>http://www.doctohelp.com/SuperPages/Webcasts/
>
> Help & Manual 5: The complete help authoring tool for individual
> authors and teams. Professional power, intuitive interface. Write
> once, publish to 8 formats. Multi-user authoring and version
> control! http://www.helpandmanual.com/
>
> ---
> You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as 2egarnet -at- rogers -dot- com -dot-
>
> To unsubscribe send a blank email to
> techwr-l-unsubscribe -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
> or visit http://lists.techwr-l.com/mailman/options/techwr-l/2egarnet%40rogers.com
>
>
> To subscribe, send a blank email to techwr-l-join -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
>
> Send administrative questions to admin -at- techwr-l -dot- com -dot- Visit
>http://www.techwr-l.com/ for more resources and info.
>
> Please move off-topic discussions to the Chat list, at:
>http://lists.techwr-l.com/mailman/listinfo/techwr-l-chat
>
Free Software Documentation Project Web Cast: Covers developing Table of
Contents, Context IDs, and Index, as well as Doc-To-Help
2009 tips, tricks, and best practices. http://www.doctohelp.com/SuperPages/Webcasts/
Help & Manual 5: The complete help authoring tool for individual
authors and teams. Professional power, intuitive interface. Write
once, publish to 8 formats. Multi-user authoring and version control! http://www.helpandmanual.com/
---
You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as archive -at- web -dot- techwr-l -dot- com -dot-