TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
I can interpret the verb "validate" in one of two ways:
To check the validatity of...
To affirm the validatity of...
Dan, can I ask which if either meaning your readers adhere to?
David
-----Original Message-----
From: techwr-l-bounces+dhandy=informatica -dot- com -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
[mailto:techwr-l-bounces+dhandy=informatica -dot- com -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com] On
Behalf Of Combs, Richard
Sent: 18 September 2009 15:38
To: Dan Goldstein; techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
Subject: RE: A little respect for "unvalidated"
Dan Goldstein wrote:
> Neither bartleby.com nor dictionary.com recognizes "unvalidated" as a
> word. Its meaning is clear enough to me, and certainly distinct from
the
> suggested "invalidated."
>
> Wiktionary, bless its little heart, does recognize this useful word.
Well, I see your point about its usefulness, and I generally look
favorably on neologisms that add nuance or subtle distinctions to the
language. I hope it catches on. But I agree with Kathleen on this one --
I'd avoid it for now as too likely to cause confusion (or make readers
question your spell-checker).
Depending on the context, a suitable replacement might add merely one
letter and one space: not validated.
IMHO, etc.
Richard
Richard G. Combs
Senior Technical Writer
Polycom, Inc.
richardDOTcombs AT polycomDOTcom
303-223-5111
------
rgcombs AT gmailDOTcom
303-777-0436
------
Free Software Documentation Project Web Cast: Covers developing Table of
Contents, Context IDs, and Index, as well as Doc-To-Help
2009 tips, tricks, and best practices. http://www.doctohelp.com/SuperPages/Webcasts/
Help & Manual 5: The complete help authoring tool for individual authors
and teams. Professional power, intuitive interface. Write once, publish
to 8 formats. Multi-user authoring and version control! http://www.helpandmanual.com/
---
You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as dhandy -at- informatica -dot- com -dot-
Free Software Documentation Project Web Cast: Covers developing Table of
Contents, Context IDs, and Index, as well as Doc-To-Help
2009 tips, tricks, and best practices. http://www.doctohelp.com/SuperPages/Webcasts/
Help & Manual 5: The complete help authoring tool for individual
authors and teams. Professional power, intuitive interface. Write
once, publish to 8 formats. Multi-user authoring and version control! http://www.helpandmanual.com/
---
You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as archive -at- web -dot- techwr-l -dot- com -dot-