TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Subject:Re: A little respect for "unvalidated" From:"Gene Kim-Eng" <techwr -at- genek -dot- com> To:<techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com> Date:Mon, 21 Sep 2009 13:17:29 -0700
I think you'll probably find it is a common term in most fields where
equipment or data is required by regulation to be "validated" or qualified
by formal testing. So far I have encountered it in aircraft/aerospace,
biotechnology, pharma/medical and telecom.
> In my line of work (medical devices), the meaning of "unvalidated" is
> crystal clear. If that's true only for one industry, then let's call it
> jargon and I'll stop hockin' the dictionaries' chainik.
>
> On the other hand, if its meaning is clear over a broad range of
> technical fields (your NIST example below) then it's an omission.
Free Software Documentation Project Web Cast: Covers developing Table of
Contents, Context IDs, and Index, as well as Doc-To-Help
2009 tips, tricks, and best practices. http://www.doctohelp.com/SuperPages/Webcasts/
Help & Manual 5: The complete help authoring tool for individual
authors and teams. Professional power, intuitive interface. Write
once, publish to 8 formats. Multi-user authoring and version control! http://www.helpandmanual.com/
---
You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as archive -at- web -dot- techwr-l -dot- com -dot-