TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Re: Doc Design and Convention ( was TECHWR-L Digest, Vol 48, Issue 27)
Subject:Re: Doc Design and Convention ( was TECHWR-L Digest, Vol 48, Issue 27) From:Robert Lauriston <robert -at- lauriston -dot- com> To:techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com Date:Wed, 4 Nov 2009 11:01:19 -0800
I didn't say anything of the sort. Marketing hype doesn't belong in
technical documentation. I never use any marketing language except
sometimes in the first few paragraphs of a user's guide and release
notes, and even there I tone it down and cut anything that's not
supported by the facts.
Documentation that reflects the specific business requirements of
prospective customers and a contextual understanding of how, by whom,
and for what purposes the product is used is a helpful tool for anyone
evaluating the product, especially when installation is a long and
complex process (as is usually the case for client-server and
Web-based applications, especially those that require a third-party
database such as Oracle or SQL Server). It helps the prospective buyer
understand whether the product would meet their needs.
I know that's true from the buyer's side as well. If it's too much
trouble to install a product and I can't tell from the docs whether it
will do the specific things I need it do, I'll move on to the next
candidate.
On Wed, Nov 4, 2009 at 10:48 AM, Gene Kim-Eng <techwr -at- genek -dot- com> wrote:
> If a company provides me with a document set as part of its presale
> presentation, one of the things i look for is an indication that they know where
> to put different kinds of information. User manuals that read like advertising
> brochures for a company's other products - or worse, like advertising brochures
> for the very product the reader has (presumably) already purchased - do not tend
> to make me want to buy a company's products. They just irritate me.
>
> Gene Kim-Eng
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Robert Lauriston" <robert -at- lauriston -dot- com>
>> By focusing narrowly on technical concerns you're excluding the
>> specific business contexts in which the tool will be used and thus
>> perhaps industry-specific warnings and tips that could be helpful to
>> users.
>>
>> Whether that matters probably depends on how varied the product's uses
>> are in practice.
>>
>> Also, a good technical writer should think like a marketer to the
>> extent that the docs may be used as presales tools.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Are you looking for one documentation tool that does it all? Author,
build, test, and publish your Help files with just one easy-to-use tool.
Try the latest Doc-To-Help 2009 v3 risk-free for 30-days at: http://www.doctohelp.com/
Help & Manual 5: The complete help authoring tool for individual
authors and teams. Professional power, intuitive interface. Write
once, publish to 8 formats. Multi-user authoring and version control! http://www.helpandmanual.com/
---
You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as archive -at- web -dot- techwr-l -dot- com -dot-