Re: RE: tifs at 240 dpi worth redoing?

Subject: Re: RE: tifs at 240 dpi worth redoing?
From: "Gene Kim-Eng" <techwr -at- genek -dot- com>
To: <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com>
Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2009 13:54:09 -0800

I would add that whatever specs you provide your vendor about your immediate
needs, always obtain and RETAIN the original file in its native format, because
as certain as death and taxes is the likelihood that someday you will need that
image again, and in some other form than the one you just specified. I wish I
had a buck for every time I discovered that some previous writer or illustrator
had created the very graphic I needed, but ended up having to spend hours
recreating it from scratch because it had only been archived in a form that was
unusable for my current project. Having to redraw a vector graphic because
someone only saved it in raster format is an annoying timewaster; having to hire
another photographer and restage a photo shoot could potentially be a
budget-busting showstopper.

Gene Kim-Eng


----- Original Message -----
From: "Al Geist" <al -dot- geist -at- geistassociates -dot- com>
>I agree with Richard. If you want an image of a certain size or resolution,
> you need to talk to the photographer about your specific needs. 8x10 at 300
> dpi, or 75 pixels by 150 pixels at 96 dpi will tell him/her exactly what you
> are looking for and he/she can then configure his output for those
> specifications. It is after all what we are talking about...the product the
> photographer delivers. The photographer can use whatever means he/she
> desires (dpi/ppi) to provide that product.

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Are you looking for one documentation tool that does it all? Author,
build, test, and publish your Help files with just one easy-to-use tool.
Try the latest Doc-To-Help 2009 v3 risk-free for 30-days at:
http://www.doctohelp.com/

Help and Manual 5: The all-in-one help authoring tool. Full support for
team authoring with multi-user editing - both directly and in combination
with VSS-compatible source control systems. http://www.helpandmanual.com/

---
You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as archive -at- web -dot- techwr-l -dot- com -dot-

To unsubscribe send a blank email to
techwr-l-unsubscribe -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
or visit http://lists.techwr-l.com/mailman/options/techwr-l/archive%40web.techwr-l.com


To subscribe, send a blank email to techwr-l-join -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com

Send administrative questions to admin -at- techwr-l -dot- com -dot- Visit
http://www.techwr-l.com/ for more resources and info.

Please move off-topic discussions to the Chat list, at:
http://lists.techwr-l.com/mailman/listinfo/techwr-l-chat


Follow-Ups:

References:
Re: RE: tifs at 240 dpi worth redoing?: From: Nancy Allison
RE: RE: tifs at 240 dpi worth redoing?: From: Boudreaux, Madelyn (GE Healthcare, consultant)
Re: RE: tifs at 240 dpi worth redoing?: From: Robert Lauriston
RE: RE: tifs at 240 dpi worth redoing?: From: Boudreaux, Madelyn (GE Healthcare, consultant)
RE: RE: tifs at 240 dpi worth redoing?: From: Combs, Richard
RE: RE: tifs at 240 dpi worth redoing?: From: Al Geist

Previous by Author: Re: RE: tifs at 240 dpi worth redoing?
Next by Author: Re: Code Annotation of the Week
Previous by Thread: RE: RE: tifs at 240 dpi worth redoing?
Next by Thread: Re: RE: tifs at 240 dpi worth redoing?


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:


Sponsored Ads