Re: in search for better tools

Subject: Re: in search for better tools
From: Robert Lauriston <robert -at- lauriston -dot- com>
To: Mike Hamilton <mhamilton -at- madcapsoftware -dot- com>, "techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com>
Date: Fri, 11 Dec 2009 08:37:20 -0800

"... this functionality is completely optional."

The privacy issue isn't with Feedback Server. It's with a .chm
generated by Flare with feedback enabled. If a software vendor bundles
such a .chm with a product, and an end user installs the product, the
tracking is *NOT* optional for that user, since there's no opt-in
dialog.

On Thu, Dec 10, 2009 at 1:02 PM, Mike Hamilton
<mhamilton -at- madcapsoftware -dot- com> wrote:
> OK, after two weeks of insane travelling and sporadic availability of web connectivity I am finally back into a connected mode.
>
> I hope I can shed some light here.
>
> The MadCap Feedback Server software has been VERY CAREFULLY crafted to not run afoul of privacy laws anywhere in the world, including the very restrictive privacy laws in European countries such as Germany.
>
> To the AntiSpywareCoalition page referenced, after careful review the MadCap Feedback Server does not run afoul of ANY of the items listed in that document.
>
> The key point to keep in mind is that the MadCap Feedback Server never, ever, tracks ANY information to ANY SPECIFIC USER. You cannot use the MadCap Feedback Server to find out the viewing habits, search habits, or anything else about ANYONE. It cannot be used to target specific information to anyone (and there are customers mad that we don't provide this). All the server does is provide documentation teams with macro-level data such as how many times the word "foo" was searched for in the last seven days. You can't see who searched for "foo", just the fact that it was searched for, and how many times in a given time period (as an example). Since no data is ever collected on any one particular user, it does not (and cannot) violate the privacy of any user.
>
> This type of functionality has been vetted by many attorneys from several different countries. We would never provide software that allowed anyone to "spy" on any of their customers.
>
> Now, having explained all of the above, it should also be pointed out that this functionality is completely optional. In order for the anonymous macro data to be reported one has to actively install the MadCap Feedback Server software and enable the functionality in their Flare project. If you have any concerns over the use of the MadCap Feedback Server software then simply don't purchase it, as it is  not a core requirement for document publishing using Flare. It is an option, only for those who choose to buy and use it. ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Are you looking for one documentation tool that does it all? Author,
build, test, and publish your Help files with just one easy-to-use tool.
Try the latest Doc-To-Help 2009 v3 risk-free for 30-days at:
http://www.doctohelp.com/

Help & Manual 5: The all-in-one help authoring tool. True single- sourcing --
generate 8 different formats and as many different versions as you need
from just one project. Fast and intuitive. http://www.helpandmanual.com/

---
You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as archive -at- web -dot- techwr-l -dot- com -dot-

To unsubscribe send a blank email to
techwr-l-unsubscribe -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
or visit http://lists.techwr-l.com/mailman/options/techwr-l/archive%40web.techwr-l.com


To subscribe, send a blank email to techwr-l-join -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com

Send administrative questions to admin -at- techwr-l -dot- com -dot- Visit
http://www.techwr-l.com/ for more resources and info.

Please move off-topic discussions to the Chat list, at:
http://lists.techwr-l.com/mailman/listinfo/techwr-l-chat


Follow-Ups:

References:
in search for better tools: From: GILLIOTTE Valérie
RE: in search for better tools: From: Connie Giordano
Re: in search for better tools: From: Robert Lauriston
RE: in search for better tools: From: Dan Goldstein
RE: in search for better tools: From: Combs, Richard
RE: in search for better tools: From: Sharon Burton
RE: in search for better tools: From: Dan Goldstein
RE: in search for better tools: From: Sharon Burton
Re: in search for better tools: From: Gene Kim-Eng
RE: in search for better tools: From: Mike Hamilton

Previous by Author: Re: Need help with Acrobat Distiller problem
Next by Author: Re: in search for better tools
Previous by Thread: RE: in search for better tools
Next by Thread: RE: in search for better tools


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:


Sponsored Ads