(OT) A bit more on a real two-edged sword...

Subject: (OT) A bit more on a real two-edged sword...
From: David Neeley <dbneeley -at- gmail -dot- com>
To: techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
Date: Sat, 30 Jan 2010 09:55:28 +0200

In an informal catalog of swords of various types, people mentioned
how a single-edged blade can be grasped by the blade itself for
increased leverage.

That was rarely a good idea, as it reduced leverage considerably.

Instead, the heavier blades simply had longer handles, designed to be
grasped when necessary by both hands.

For example, the Scottish broadsword had such a longer handle--but the
largest ones of these monsters were said to have weighed as much as
two hundred pounds. Not many swings could be made even by a strong
swordsman, but then not many were usually needed, I'd guess.

Of course, for a race whose entertainment included tossing logs
(tabers) for fun, I suppose wielding a monster blade might seem all in
a day's work.

Note, too, that the Japanese samurai swords had long handles as well,
and could easily be swung by two hands if desired. The best of these,
though, were sharp enough that two hands would rarely have been
necessary. Some of the ones made many hundreds of years ago have
rarely, if ever, been equaled.

Still, I'd avoid referencing any of them in documentation--unless,
perhaps, you are documenting a computer game featuring sword fighting!

David
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Are you looking for one documentation tool that does it all? Author,
build, test, and publish your Help files with just one easy-to-use tool.
Try the latest Doc-To-Help 2009 v3 risk-free for 30-days at:
http://www.doctohelp.com/

Explore CAREER options and paths related to Technical Writing,
learn to create SOFTWARE REQUIREMENTS documents, and
get tips on FUNCTIONAL SPECIFICATION best practices. Free at:
http://www.ModernAnalyst.com

---
You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as archive -at- web -dot- techwr-l -dot- com -dot-

To unsubscribe send a blank email to
techwr-l-unsubscribe -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
or visit http://lists.techwr-l.com/mailman/options/techwr-l/archive%40web.techwr-l.com


To subscribe, send a blank email to techwr-l-join -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com

Send administrative questions to admin -at- techwr-l -dot- com -dot- Visit
http://www.techwr-l.com/ for more resources and info.

Please move off-topic discussions to the Chat list, at:
http://lists.techwr-l.com/mailman/listinfo/techwr-l-chat


Previous by Author: Re: TECHWR-L Digest, Vol 51, Issue 27
Next by Author: (OT) The Chaos
Previous by Thread: Re: how bad is the job market? New job requirements (ACK!!)??
Next by Thread: (OT) The Chaos


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:


Sponsored Ads