Double-edged sword (was Re: Mixing metaphors?)

Subject: Double-edged sword (was Re: Mixing metaphors?)
From: Tony Chung <tonyc -at- tonychung -dot- ca>
To: TECHWR-L Writing <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com>
Date: Sun, 31 Jan 2010 00:20:51 -0800

On Sat, Jan 30, 2010 at 11:37 PM, David Neeley <dbneeley -at- gmail -dot- com> wrote:

>
> Although I am speculating here, perhaps
> to their audience a "double edged sword" may simply have been
> recognized as being sharper than they could get with an inferior
> blade--which, being of lesser material, may have had to have been
> single edged simply to have enough mass to resist breaking.
>
>
Ah... so the double-edged sword in this case may merely mean super-sharp,
like a "Ginsu" blade, with which you can allegedly even cut a tin can --
just look at that tomato!

Some of those in this thread have said the "double edged sword is
> dangerous to you and to the foe"--but that is not quite correct. If
> that were all there was to it, it would never have been made and used for
> hundreds of years--people were no more foolish then than we are today, after
> all. Instead, the two edges were dangerous to a foe on both fore and back
> strokes, reducing the vulnerability of the swordsman during combat.
>
>
And increasing the lethality of the weapon during combat. Swing it one way
to cut your opponent. Swing it the other way to cut another opponent...
double-edged in this case then represents twice as capable.

It makes sense. The actual greek word used in the New Testament for
double-edged is "distomos" which means "two-mouthed". It symbolizes the
power of a word being spoken and then repeated. (Theologically, God spoke
the word once, which we repeat, and reinforce its meaning within us).

So, double-edged may not mean mixed blessing, or dichotomous, but rather,
double trouble, twice as powerful, twice as lethal... doubly good or doubly
bad, depending on the wielder's swordsmanship.

Thanks, David!

--
Tony Chung: Creative Communications
Cell: +1-604-710-5164
Email: tonyc -at- tonychung -dot- ca * Web: http://tonychung.ca
Skype: tonychung.ca * GTalk/MSN: tonychung -dot- ca -at- gmail -dot- com
Twitter: @techcom * Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/tonychung.ca
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Are you looking for one documentation tool that does it all? Author,
build, test, and publish your Help files with just one easy-to-use tool.
Try the latest Doc-To-Help 2009 v3 risk-free for 30-days at:
http://www.doctohelp.com/

Explore CAREER options and paths related to Technical Writing,
learn to create SOFTWARE REQUIREMENTS documents, and
get tips on FUNCTIONAL SPECIFICATION best practices. Free at:
http://www.ModernAnalyst.com

---
You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as archive -at- web -dot- techwr-l -dot- com -dot-

To unsubscribe send a blank email to
techwr-l-unsubscribe -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
or visit http://lists.techwr-l.com/mailman/options/techwr-l/archive%40web.techwr-l.com


To subscribe, send a blank email to techwr-l-join -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com

Send administrative questions to admin -at- techwr-l -dot- com -dot- Visit
http://www.techwr-l.com/ for more resources and info.

Please move off-topic discussions to the Chat list, at:
http://lists.techwr-l.com/mailman/listinfo/techwr-l-chat


Previous by Author: Re: Mixing metaphors?
Next by Author: On-screen hints
Previous by Thread: Re: TECHWR-L Digest, Vol 51, Issue 29


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:


Sponsored Ads