TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Subject:Re: RoboHelp vs Flare From:Rick Stone <rstone75 -at- kc -dot- rr -dot- com> To:laura_johnson -at- agilent -dot- com Date:Sat, 20 Nov 2010 02:42:53 -0600
Hi Laura
I may be mistaken here, but it is my understanding that Flare and
RoboHelp are two separate products.
Flare is not simply the RoboHelp code base rehashed as you seem to be
suggesting. If it is, it suffers from the same crufty, hard to enhance
code, no?
Cheers... Rick :)
laura_johnson -at- agilent -dot- com wrote:
> I switched from RoboHelp to Flare several years ago, and like Flare much better. The use model is cleaner and makes more sense to me, there seem to be fewer bugs, the support and discussion forums are excellent.
>
> It's also worth knowing a bit about the history of the product. RoboHelp was sold or transferred from one company to another several times before landing at Adobe. In the course of those transfers, most of the RoboHelp development team was shaken loose (laid off or quit), and they formed Flare. Flare is a reimplementation of RoboHelp, in a sense, wherein the dev team got to fix the problems they'd become aware of and modernize the architecture and implementation of the software. Meantime, RoboHelp languished with scarcely any enhancements for several years. What this suggests to me is that RoboHelp's internals are old, crufty, hard to enhance, and supported by relative newbies, whereas Flare is a new architecture supported by devs who are both experienced and excited about the product. (I've met some of them at WritersUA and they do seem energetic and charged up about Flare.) Mind you, that's a subjective opinion fed by a bunch of assumptions, but if I'm right, it means that
> Flare will get new features faster and will be stabler (less buggy) over time - the payoff of better software architecture.
>
>
>
>
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>
> Create and publish documentation through multiple channels with Doc-To-Help.
> Choose your authoring formats and get any output you may need. Try
> Doc-To-Help, now with MS SharePoint integration, free for 30-days.
>http://www.doctohelp.com
>
> ---
> You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as rstone75 -at- kc -dot- rr -dot- com -dot-
>
> To unsubscribe send a blank email to
> techwr-l-unsubscribe -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
> or visit http://lists.techwr-l.com/mailman/options/techwr-l/rstone75%40kc.rr.com
>
>
> To subscribe, send a blank email to techwr-l-join -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
>
> Send administrative questions to admin -at- techwr-l -dot- com -dot- Visit
>http://www.techwr-l.com/ for more resources and info.
>
> Please move off-topic discussions to the Chat list, at:
>http://lists.techwr-l.com/mailman/listinfo/techwr-l-chat
>
>
>
Create and publish documentation through multiple channels with Doc-To-Help.
Choose your authoring formats and get any output you may need. Try
Doc-To-Help, now with MS SharePoint integration, free for 30-days. http://www.doctohelp.com
---
You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as archive -at- web -dot- techwr-l -dot- com -dot-
