TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Subject:Re: "The six crappiest interview questions" From:Gene Kim-Eng <techwr -at- genek -dot- com> To:techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com Date:Thu, 10 Feb 2011 09:55:19 -0800
I've always had mixed feelings about the "weakness" question.
One the one hand, anyone who knows anything about interviewing knows a
candidate is going to feed back a response that's crafted to sound
like a strength because the question is so stupid that everyone has
already looked on the web for suggestions about how to answer it and
gotten the same guidance from 100 job hunting websites.
On the other hand, it's a good sign that your interviewer is working
off some "how to interview" article and you can lead the conversation
into areas you want it to go.
My preference when I'm interviewing candidates is to ask what area/s
of the job description (if any) they may need more time or training to
come up to speed on.
Gene Kim-Eng
On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 9:18 AM, Jan Axelson <jan -at- lvr -dot- com> wrote:
> I was once asked, "What are your _two_ biggest weaknesses?"
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Create and publish documentation through multiple channels with Doc-To-Help.
Choose your authoring formats and get any output you may need. Try
Doc-To-Help, now with MS SharePoint integration, free for 30-days. http://www.doctohelp.com
---
You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as archive -at- web -dot- techwr-l -dot- com -dot-