TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
RE: Question for writers in New Zealand and Australia
Subject:RE: Question for writers in New Zealand and Australia From:<Brian -dot- Henderson -at- mitchell1 -dot- com> To:<Techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com> Date:Tue, 21 Feb 2012 10:11:29 -0800
I'm not so sure about that, Julie. I don't think it would hardly
register if I had to pick "U.S./Canada". Now, I would probably wonder
about a "U.S./Mexico" grouping, but only because it's unusual to see
them lumped together in anything other than a purely geographical
context. But neither would bother me if there's a reason to combine
them.
I should add: I would absolutely NOT tolerate "Canada/U.S.". That's just
wrong!
-Brian H.
-----Original Message----- From: Julie Stickler
I think most people would not appreciate seeing their country lumped in
as part of another country just because they are geographically close to
each other.