Re: i.e. vs e.g.

Subject: Re: i.e. vs e.g.
From: Chris Morton <salt -dot- morton -at- gmail -dot- com>
To: techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
Date: Fri, 13 Apr 2012 14:19:56 -0700

> I prefer to reserve the use of Latin phrases and abbreviations for online
> forums and other places where *I'm more willing to risk making an error
> and appearing to be a pseudo-intellectual who is actually illiterate*,
>
> Gene Kim-Eng
>

.....,e.g.,........

*(duckin' 'n grinnin')*

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Create and publish documentation through multiple channels with Doc-To-Help. Choose your authoring formats and get any output you may need.

Try Doc-To-Help, now with MS SharePoint integration, free for 30-days.

http://bit.ly/doc-to-help

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as archive -at- web -dot- techwr-l -dot- com -dot-

To unsubscribe send a blank email to
techwr-l-leave -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com


Send administrative questions to admin -at- techwr-l -dot- com -dot- Visit
http://www.techwhirl.com/email-discussion-groups/ for more resources and info.

Looking for articles on Technical Communications? Head over to our online magazine at http://techwhirl.com

Looking for the archived Techwr-l email discussions? Search our public email archives @ http://techwr-l.com/archives


References:
i.e. vs e.g.: From: Bruce Megan (ST-CO/ENS2.5-NA)
Re: i.e. vs e.g.: From: Chris Morton
RE: i.e. vs e.g.: From: Bruce Megan (ST-CO/ENS2.5-NA)
Re: i.e. vs e.g.: From: Chris Morton
RE: i.e. vs e.g.: From: Porrello, Leonard
Re: i.e. vs e.g.: From: Chris Morton
RE: i.e. vs e.g.: From: Combs, Richard
Re: i.e. vs e.g.: From: Gene Kim-Eng

Previous by Author: Re: i.e. vs e.g.
Next by Author: Re: i.e. vs e.g.
Previous by Thread: Re: i.e. vs e.g.
Next by Thread: Re: i.e. vs e.g.


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:


Sponsored Ads