Re: [External] Re: SharePoint question
Once upon a time, in a twisty little company on a planet far, far away, I considered adding technically incorrect material so that I could find out if anyone actually read the draft copy. (In software testing it's called "bebugging.") Never did it. There were always enough things wrong even in the final drafts.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
New! Doc-to-Help 2013 features the industry's first HTML5 editor for authoring.
Learn more: http://bit.ly/ZeOZeQ
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as archive -at- web -dot- techwr-l -dot- com -dot-
To unsubscribe send a blank email to
techwr-l-leave -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
Send administrative questions to admin -at- techwr-l -dot- com -dot- Visit
http://www.techwhirl.com/email-discussion-groups/ for more resources and info.
Looking for articles on Technical Communications? Head over to our online magazine at http://techwhirl.com
Looking for the archived Techwr-l email discussions? Search our public email archives @ http://techwr-l.com/archives
Follow-Ups:
- FrameMaker Question, William Sherman
References:
RE: SharePoint question: From: Combs, Richard
Re: SharePoint question: From: Matt Gras
Re: [External] Re: SharePoint question: From: Peter Neilson
Previous by Author:
Re: spec writing - is simple ever wrong ?
Next by Author:
FrameMaker Question
Previous by Thread:
Re: [External] Re: SharePoint question
Next by Thread:
FrameMaker Question
Search our Technical Writing Archives & Magazine
Visit TechWhirl's Other Sites
Sponsored Ads