RE: Using tables for content

Subject: RE: Using tables for content
From: "Janoff, Steven" <Steven -dot- Janoff -at- ga -dot- com>
To: "techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com>, Robert Lauriston <robert -at- lauriston -dot- com>
Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2013 10:24:35 -0700

Disagree. You're making too many assumptions about Sean's process.

Sean had a good idea and should be encouraged to explore it if he so desires.

And again, all of your objections come from the author convenience standpoint. There's nothing about usability here, and that to me is the ultimate question.

Steve


-----Original Message-----
From: On Behalf Of Robert Lauriston
Sent: Thursday, October 24, 2013 10:17 AM
To: techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
Subject: Re: Using tables for content

It's not an analogy. I've mapped Word styles to HTML and CSS (or
vice-versa) many times.

The need to do that sort of thing is exactly why it's a bad idea to use tables to define ordered lists. The amount of time I've spent undoing messes other people made with tables probably adds up to several months at this point.

Sean had a bad idea and should be discouraged from pursuing it.

On Thu, Oct 24, 2013 at 9:59 AM, Janoff, Steven <Steven -dot- Janoff -at- ga -dot- com> wrote:
> The CSS analogy doesn't apply here. That has to do with coding practice. Using Word styles has nothing to do with coding in HTML & CSS.
>
> This is about (1) author convenience, and (2) usability (or Information Design, or whatever you want to call it).
>
> From an author convenience standpoint, if you can rock tables, that's a great skill.
>
> From a usability standpoint, if you're good at organizing information, you can rock a table-style presentation. As to who needs feedback on using tables for procedures, I'd say anybody considering that as a presentation mode vs. the usual ordered list-style presentation.
>
> The old documents from the 60s and 70s that used this style were very effective, as I recall. There's no reason you can't make it work.



^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
New! Doc-to-Help 2013 features the industry's first HTML5 editor for authoring.

Learn more: http://bit.ly/ZeOZeQ

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as archive -at- web -dot- techwr-l -dot- com -dot-

To unsubscribe send a blank email to
techwr-l-leave -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com


Send administrative questions to admin -at- techwr-l -dot- com -dot- Visit
http://www.techwhirl.com/email-discussion-groups/ for more resources and info.

Looking for articles on Technical Communications? Head over to our online magazine at http://techwhirl.com

Looking for the archived Techwr-l email discussions? Search our public email archives @ http://techwr-l.com/archives


Follow-Ups:

References:
Using tables for content: From: Sean
RE: Using tables for content: From: Janoff, Steven
Re: Using tables for content: From: Haim Roman
RE: Using tables for content: From: Paul Hanson
RE: Using tables for content: From: Janoff, Steven
Re: Using tables for content: From: Robert Lauriston

Previous by Author: RE: Using tables for content
Next by Author: RE: Using tables for content
Previous by Thread: Re: Using tables for content
Next by Thread: Re: Using tables for content


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:


Sponsored Ads