TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
On Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at 12:56 PM, McLauchlan, Kevin <
Kevin -dot- McLauchlan -at- safenet-inc -dot- com> wrote:
> </rant off> is redundant.
> Should just be <rant> and </rant>
> If you weren't so freakin' ancient, you'd remember that!
> (Sez the guy who turns sixty in about two months. ) :-D
> That emoticon just feels insufficient for a BSEG, don't you find?
> -----Original Message-----
> From: techwr-l-bounces+kevin -dot- mclauchlan=safenet-inc -dot- com -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com[mailto:
> techwr-l-bounces+kevin -dot- mclauchlan=safenet-inc -dot- com -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com] On
> Behalf Of Chris Morton
> Sent: January-13-14 3:48 PM
> To: techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
> Subject: Re: Skype interviewing
> I started such a thread almost a year ago when faced with a video
> interview as a job applicant. I passed through all of the hoops in F2F
> meetings with the local company reps, including the VP. But when it came to
> the video interview with a key developer in Ottawa, my hopes were dashed.
> I had "set the stage" as best I could and went through a trial with a
> family member, but was using an older Logitech camera that didn't help. The
> other problem was that the Ottawa interviewer did all of the talking-the
> first sign that the interview was doomed. (The adage is that a decision is
> reached within... what?...thirty seconds?) I'm sure the quasi-fisheye
> distortion from my camera didn't help, nor did its angle from atop my
> monitor. (I have since purchased a better, newer Logitech that mounts to a
> tripod and provides a superior image.)
> After I posted to this forum about my experience, one respondent wrote
> that she would never agree to a video interview. After considering her
> post, I have to agree. If I were applying for a position where appearance
> is part of the job, such as a TV anchor or some such, then a video
> interview would make sense. But as a tech writer, a telephone interview (in
> lieu of F2F) should be sufficient; if it isn't, then maybe that's not a job
> one really wants.
> For the same reason, I held out posting a photo on my LinkedIn profile for
> many years before finally caving in last year. What I look like-graying,
> thinning hair 'n all-shouldn't have anything to do with whether or not I'm
> qualified and, in fact, runs counter to EOE laws, IMO.
> </rant off>
> The information contained in this electronic mail transmission
> may be privileged and confidential, and therefore, protected
> from disclosure. If you have received this communication in
> error, please notify us immediately by replying to this
> message and deleting it from your computer without copying
> or disclosing it.
New! Doc-to-Help 2013 features the industry's first HTML5 editor for authoring.