TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Subject:Re: Electric vs. electrical From:Dave C <davec2468 -at- yahoo -dot- com> To:Tech Writing <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com> Date:Wed, 15 Jan 2014 13:44:03 -0800
Whereas “electric engineer” would need no organic fuel but would be very expensive to operate!
OK, I’m leaning toward “electrical”—it does seem more natural to say “electrical repair”. I was getting a bit over-analytical I think. If I were to take this any further I’d take Peter’s suggestion and hand out different versions and poll the target audience.
Thank you to all who contributed.
On 15 Jan 2014, at 1:14 PM, Gene Kim-Eng <techwr -at- genek -dot- com> wrote:
> In the classic definitions, "Electrical" means "related to electricity," while "electric" refers to electricity as a power source (generation, transmission or consumption). An electrical engineer works on electric generators, electric power lines, electric motors, etc.
> Gene Kim-Eng
New! Doc-to-Help 2013 features the industry's first HTML5 editor for authoring.