Re: Economist magazine points to decline of tech writing

Subject: Re: Economist magazine points to decline of tech writing
From: Gene Kim-Eng <techwr -at- genek -dot- com>
To: Dan Goldstein <DGoldstein -at- nuot -dot- com>
Date: Sat, 3 Jan 2015 02:30:43 -0800

New technology invariably reduces or eliminates some existing jobs while
creating new ones. If we look at the various jobs that used to be part of
the documentation process - writers, editors, illustrators, page layout and
manual printing and other peripheral workers, are there more or fewer hands
involved per page of document today than there used to be?
My guess, comparing things today to 20-30 years ago is that the higher
number of writers is exceeded by the fewer number of all the other people
who used to do the things our DTP and CMS technology now do.

Will increasingly powerful AIs lead to smaller numbers of writers needed to
collect, analyze, organize and convert raw data into usable documentation?
Most likely. Will new jobs be created to develop and direct the new AIs?
Most likely. Will the number of new jobs created be greater or fewer than
the number of jobs eliminated? My guess is it will be fewer on a per page
or per document basis, but if the result is that more product is produced,
there may not be a decline in the total number of jobs.

The real question today's tech writers need to address is whether they will
be prepared to move into the new jobs.

Gene Kim-Egg



On Fri, Jan 2, 2015 at 11:47 PM, Dan Goldstein <DGoldstein -at- nuot -dot- com> wrote:

> If tech writer job eliminations started over a decade ago, why does the
> number of tech writers continue to rise? Has the computerization of
> technical documentation stalled?
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Read about how Georgia System Operation Corporation improved teamwork, communication, and efficiency using Doc-To-Help | http://bit.ly/1pJ4zPa

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as archive -at- web -dot- techwr-l -dot- com -dot-

To unsubscribe send a blank email to
techwr-l-leave -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com


Send administrative questions to admin -at- techwr-l -dot- com -dot- Visit
http://www.techwhirl.com/email-discussion-groups/ for more resources and info.

Looking for articles on Technical Communications? Head over to our online magazine at http://techwhirl.com

Looking for the archived Techwr-l email discussions? Search our public email archives @ http://techwr-l.com/archives


Follow-Ups:

References:
Economist magazine points to decline of tech writing: From: Lois Patterson
Re: Economist magazine points to decline of tech writing: From: Gene Kim-Eng
RE: Economist magazine points to decline of tech writing: From: Dan Goldstein

Previous by Author: Re: Economist magazine points to decline of tech writing
Next by Author: Re: Economist magazine points to decline of tech writing
Previous by Thread: RE: Economist magazine points to decline of tech writing
Next by Thread: Re: Economist magazine points to decline of tech writing


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:


Sponsored Ads