Re: Is (technical) writing more art, or science?

Subject: Re: Is (technical) writing more art, or science?
From: Sean Brierley <sean -dot- brierley -at- gerberscientific -dot- com>
To: "techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com>
Date: Fri, 21 Aug 2015 09:07:13 -0400

All three. I'd say, 50% trade and 25% each of the others. I consider my
first two jobs to have been apprenticeships, and I learned buckets at them.

On Fri, Aug 21, 2015 at 8:31 AM, Cardimon, Craig <ccardimon -at- m-s-g -dot- com>

> This post describes writing as an art.
> So, is technical writing an art, science, trade, or a mix of all three?
Learn more about Adobe Technical Communication Suite (2015 Release) |


You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as archive -at- web -dot- techwr-l -dot- com -dot-

To unsubscribe send a blank email to
techwr-l-leave -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com

Send administrative questions to admin -at- techwr-l -dot- com -dot- Visit for more resources and info.

Looking for articles on Technical Communications? Head over to our online magazine at

Looking for the archived Techwr-l email discussions? Search our public email archives @

Is (technical) writing more art, or science?: From: Cardimon, Craig

Previous by Author: Re: Wiki for Product Documentation
Next by Author: RE: manual vs white paper
Previous by Thread: RE: Is (technical) writing more art, or science?
Next by Thread: Re: Is (technical) writing more art, or science?

What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads