SharePoint: versions and workflows

Subject: SharePoint: versions and workflows
From: Chris Morton <salt -dot- morton -at- gmail -dot- com>
To: "techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com>
Date: Tue, 20 Oct 2015 15:05:14 -0400

Can anyone venture a guess as to why my employerâa Fortune 500 company
known as a "document company"âwould elect to deploy SharePoint Server 2007
on any large-scale project? That is, are there valid reasons for having
chosen SPS 2010 or 2013? Curious minds would like to know....

For the following, assume we're stuck with SPS 2007:

Any experience with using the built-in workflow system for document
routing? Each doc needs to be passed along a defined path, with several
approvers along the way. Is SharePoint Designer required to do this
effectively (that is, make it actually function as desired)? What's


> Chris (who took Tony's advice for now and is just watching the Kafkaesque
drama unfold)
Visit TechWhirl for the latest on content technology, content strategy and content development |


You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as archive -at- web -dot- techwr-l -dot- com -dot-

To unsubscribe send a blank email to
techwr-l-leave -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com

Send administrative questions to admin -at- techwr-l -dot- com -dot- Visit for more resources and info.

Looking for articles on Technical Communications? Head over to our online magazine at

Looking for the archived Techwr-l email discussions? Search our public email archives @


Previous by Author: Re: Font vs. Typeface
Next by Author: Re: Partial Screenshot Indicators
Previous by Thread: Fwd: Font vs. Typeface
Next by Thread: Re: SharePoint: versions and workflows

What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads