RE: Statistical analysis

Subject: RE: Statistical analysis
From: Dan Goldstein <DGoldstein -at- nuot -dot- com>
To: "TECHWR-L (techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com)" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com>
Date: Mon, 11 Apr 2016 12:18:14 +0000

Correct. That's just one of many caveats to the study. You'll see the whole list in the Limitations section when it's published.



-----Original Message-----
From: Doug Grossman
Sent: Sunday, April 10, 2016 9:53 PM
To: TECHWR-L (techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com)
Subject: RE: Statistical analysis

Also, how will you know everyone's gender? We may think that it is obvious that "David" and "John" are males, but it may not actually be the case. We have a "Lynn" who is a male, for example. There is no way to really know whether "Sam" or "Pat" or "Chris" or "Conner" is a male or female, and any guess would be just that.......a guess.

This question aside, I think that the analysis could be very interesting.

Visit TechWhirl for the latest on content technology, content strategy and content development |


You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as archive -at- web -dot- techwr-l -dot- com -dot-

To unsubscribe send a blank email to
techwr-l-leave -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com

Send administrative questions to admin -at- techwr-l -dot- com -dot- Visit for more resources and info.

Looking for articles on Technical Communications? Head over to our online magazine at

Looking for the archived Techwr-l email discussions? Search our public email archives @


Statistical analysis: From: Dan Goldstein
RE: Statistical analysis: From: Doug Grossman

Previous by Author: Statistical analysis
Next by Author: RE: Statistical analysis
Previous by Thread: RE: Statistical analysis
Next by Thread: RE: Statistical analysis

What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads