Re: Working Off Site

Subject: Re: Working Off Site
From: Robert Lauriston <robert -at- lauriston -dot- com>
To: TECHWR-L Writing <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com>
Date: Mon, 11 Apr 2016 11:50:59 -0700

That's illegal. If a company was stupid enough to end my contract
prematurely on that basis, as soon as my lawyer talked with their
lawyer the company would cut me a check to avoid having to talk with
the IRS about it.

On Mon, Apr 11, 2016 at 4:26 AM, monique.semp (Earthlink)
<monique -dot- semp -at- earthlink -dot- net> wrote:
> A great theory- but the company does have the option to simply not hire a person for 1099 work. The law is the law, but that has nothing to do with practicality and reality. And I doubt that a worker would have much of a case if s/he took a contract where the client expected onsite work, and then the worker says "sorry, I'm going to work offsite and tough luck to you."
Visit TechWhirl for the latest on content technology, content strategy and content development |


You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as archive -at- web -dot- techwr-l -dot- com -dot-

To unsubscribe send a blank email to
techwr-l-leave -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com

Send administrative questions to admin -at- techwr-l -dot- com -dot- Visit for more resources and info.

Looking for articles on Technical Communications? Head over to our online magazine at

Looking for the archived Techwr-l email discussions? Search our public email archives @


Working Off Site: From: Laura Phillips
Re: Working Off Site: From: Robert Lauriston
RE: Working Off Site: From: Doug Grossman
Re: Working Off Site: From: Gene Kim-Eng
Re: Working Off Site: From: monique.semp (Earthlink)

Previous by Author: Re: Working Off Site
Next by Author: Re: Developments in the review cycle
Previous by Thread: Re: Working Off Site
Next by Thread: Re: Working Off Site

What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads