TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
The original IFU was copyrighted in 2013. I've been told that they have
product throughout the US, EU and Turkey. Remodeling inside their facility
is going on like mad, apparently to accommodate additional hires.
So, no, I don't believe the company is in a last-ditch mode to get
something to market or a show, per se.
Think about this, please, if the IFU is solely regarded as nothing more
than a requirement, that they rely instead on individual training (they do
have a training facility), then why was I carefully selected to come on? My
contract is substantial (although I have yet to see the actual PO and be
Meanwhile, my handler (who I surmise is a newly-minted PM who was directed
by higher-ups to "get some help") is out until the 11th to attend to a
family matter. I am reticent to approach anyone else within the company,
although the person I sense is her boss met with me during my interview and
we get on quite well.
On Wed, Jan 4, 2017 at 4:58 PM, Gene Kim-Eng <techwr -at- genek -dot- com> wrote:
> I think it's pretty unlikely that the company's management doesn't know
> this. So either they don't really care because they've already sussed that
> they're not going to make it past the angel stage, or they're being pushed
> by their investors to get something out to present to potential customers
> ASAP. Is there a trade show for that industry coming up in the next month
> or so?
> If their product is going to be FDA regulated, see if you can find
> something about document requirements here:
> If you can convince them that the FDA is not going *allow* them to ship
> product without adequate documentation, that will be much more effective
> than trying to pitch image issues to a company that hasn't got one yet.
> Gene Kim-Eng
> On 1/4/17 3:38 AM, Chris Morton wrote:
> I'm looking for some pre-existing verbiage from somewhere that explains why
> a company's image can be irreparably damaged by publishing and distributing
> such junk.
> [image: Avast logo]
> This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
Visit TechWhirl for the latest on content technology, content strategy and content development | http://techwhirl.com